논문 상세보기

Valence as Modality-General and Arousal as Modality-Specific: A Bayesian Multivariate Analysis of Emotional Responses to Gustatory and Auditory Stimuli KCI 등재

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/447980
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,300원
감성과학 (Korean Journal of the science of Emotion & sensibility)
한국감성과학회 (The Korean Society For Emotion & Sensibility)
초록

The question of whether core affective dimensions are represented in a modality-general or modality-specific manner remains a central issue in affective science. Most prior research examined vision and audition, leaving unclear whether other modalities, such as gustation, share similar affective structures. Using behavioral ratings from Park and Kim (2024), we applied a Bayesian hierarchical multivariate model to examine emotional responses to gustatory and auditory stimuli. We defined theoretically motivated contrasts for valence and arousal and assessed alignment between estimated category effects and these contrasts through posterior projections, cosine similarity, and Mahalanobis distances. Across analyses, valence exhibited strong alignment between modalities, with minimal cross-modal differences, supporting a modality-general representation. Conversely, arousal showed weak and divergent alignments: taste displayed weak positive alignment, whereas music exhibited negative alignment, accompanied by greater cross-modal separability. Posterior predictive checks indicated that the model adequately captured the observed condition means. These results align with previous neuroimaging, psychophysiological, and behavioral evidence suggesting that valence is encoded in abstract, supramodal representations, while arousal is more sensitive to modality-specific processes. Methodologically, this study demonstrates the value of Bayesian multivariate modeling in quantifying uncertainty and testing theoretically driven contrasts in multidimensional affective data.

목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
    2.1. Data description
    2.2. Statistical analyses
3. Results
    3.1. Alignment with valence and arousaldimensions
    3.2. Modality differences in alignment
    3.3. Multivariate effect size analysis
    3.4. Model fit and posterior predictive checks
    3.5. Robustness to the LKJ prior
    3.6. Sensitivity to alternative priors
    3.7. Model comparison
4. Discussion
REFERENCES
저자
  • Jongwan Kim(Associate professor, Department of Psychology, Jeonbuk National University)