고속 활주선에서 차인은 활주자세 변화 뿐 아니라 선체의 균형을 잡아주는 역할을 하며, 저항성능에 큰 영향을 미친다. 그러나 이러한 차인의 설계는 배수량, 선저경사각, 흘수, 선폭 등 다양한 설계 인자들에 영향을 받는 변수로 많은 경험을 필요로 한다. 본 연구에 서는 경험식이 아닌 계산을 통해 차인에 대한 설계 시 형상에 대한 기본적인 지침 마련을 목적으로 고속 활주선의 차인의 형상에 따른 저항성능에 대해 계산하였다. 설계는 상용 설계 프로그램인 Yacht-one을 이용하였으며, 유동해석은 상용 해석프로그램인 STAR-CCM+으로 DFBI(Dynamic Fluid Body Interaction)방법을 적용하여 수행하였다. 초기 설계 차인 각도인 17도를 기준으로 차인 15도, 차인 16도, 차인 19도 로 변경하여 설계 속도인 30노트에서 해석을 수행하였다. 그 결과, trim은 4개의 차인 중 16도가 가장 컸으며, heave는 차인 15도에서 가장 우수하였다. 해석 결과를 봤을 때 저항 측면에서 초기 설계 각도인 차인 17도 보다 차인 16도가 우수함을 보이고 있어 실제 설계 시 초기 설계 각도에서 +2도, -2도의 범위로 계산을 통해 저항 성능과 자세에서 우수한 차인을 선택해야 함을 알 수 있다.

Displacement response of structure is valuable information for monitoring an structure integrity. However, measuring the displacement response is difficult than other structure responses, such as acceleration, strain, and angle. So, previous researches have focused on displacement estimation technique using measured acceleration. The displacement estimation methods also have weakness that filtering noise of measured data is so complicate. The estimated displacement might be diverged because of the measuring noise. Because of these reasons, this study focused on rotation angle. This study developed a algorithm for estimating displacement and structure deformed shape using rotation angle.

TThe cooperation on disaster prevention between the two Koreas has been mostly focused on cooperation at the recovery stage, such as emergency relief supplies and equipment support. This study aims to articulate future practical development plans by analyzing disaster cooperation between North and South Korea in accordance with the changing paradigm of international disaster cooperation. Considering the specificity of inter-Korean cooperation, the Framework for Inter-Korean Disaster Prevention Cooperation was established centering on the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. The framework consists of understanding and sharing disaster risks, building back better, strengthening community resilience, and supporting regional disaster action plans for continuous action. Inter-Korean disaster prevention cooperation requires sharing information about North Korean disasters. It is necessary to accurately identify and support social vulnerability to North Korean disasters. Above all, it is supporting the development of disaster action plans from a humanitarian perspective needs. A medium-to-long term resilience reinforcement plan that North Korea can resolve on its own is also needed. Since North Korea is also deeply interested in international disaster cooperation, it should be based on the direction of the Sendai Framework. Considering the uniqueness of inter-Korean cooperation, a path for North Korea to actively participate in international disaster cooperation should be established.

This paper explores community-based flood disaster risk governance by applying a sensemaking approach. The conceptual sensemaking framework consists of individual experience, dialogue, and socialization components, which together comprise an interconnected system. This study presents a method for applying this framework by using a concerns table and a SWOT analysis to examine the concerns of residents living in a flood plain. A series of community-based workshops on flood risk reduction was conducted with residents of the floodprone Muraida community in Shiga Prefecture, Japan. During the workshops, residents’ concerns regarding flood risk surfaced. This study used an idiographic approach to examine the proceedings of the workshops. SWOT issue analysis was used to examine the strengths and weaknesses in the Muraida community’s internal capacities, and examine the opportunities and threats in the external capacities (e.g., local government). Additionally, a SWOT strategy analysis was conducted to identify strategies for knowledge sharing and development of cooperative countermeasures that can be undertaken between the Muraida community and the local government. The results show that the concerns table can not only summarize the main concerns of all workshops, but also provide an understanding of alternative flood risk countermeasures that can be carried out.

This paper aims to explore the risk governance framework and socially viable solutions, attempting to provide guidance for the decision making process. The key idea of this study start with overcoming the limitations of IRGC risk governance framework, which mainly focuses on a comprehensive framework for risk governance. This article has employed SWOT analysis as a methodology, which is a strategic planning technique used to help identifying the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to business competition or risk management. In this paper, socially viable solutions as an alternative plan place emphasis on the adoption of concern assessment through a concerns table. It is also proposed that scoping has to get introduced, with SWOT analysis in the process. The results of this paper support that multiple stakeholders have to participate in the process of identifying and framing risk and communicating with each other, considering the context. It should be noted that communities can become involved and take important parts in decision making process in various ways. It is recommended that engaging stakeholders to both risk assessment and risk management is material to dealing with risk in a socially viable way. It also implies that the community-based disaster management should be better prepared for the decision making process in socially viable solutions.