The purpose of this study is to propose revisions to the Jeju 4.3 Special Law for the purpose of further investigation of Jeju 4.3 so that the complete resolution and appropriate legal solutions may come. The President, Moon Jae-In, who visited Jeju on April 3, 2018, promised a complete resolution of the Jeju 4.3 incident, defining the Jeju 4.3 incident as "violence perpetrated by state power." On Jan. 17, 2019, the Jeju District Court ruled in a retrial suit filed against the military tribunal by 18 surviving inmates under the leadership of the Jeju 4.3 Truth Commission and the Citizens' Solidarity for the Restoration of Honor. This is a very important case in which the military tribunal and their rulings were ruled invalid. Jeju 4.3 is still a painful history of Jeju that has not been resolved.

Korea Jeju District Court Presiding Judge Mr. Jaegal, Chang, Mr. Judge Chung, Seung-jin, and Judge Mr. Seo, Youngwoo declared Jeju District Court Second Criminal Department The Decision on January 17, 2019. The indictment against the accused is applicable when ‘the procedure for filing an appeal is invalid in violation of legal regulations’, according to Article 327 No. 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act, all charges against the accused should be dismissed. Dong Soo Park (330310-1933019), Unemployed, Residence: Jeju-si Jaesung 1-gil 14 apt#101, Registration base: Jeju-si Ora 3-dong 2613.

The National Museum of Taiwan History is holding a special exhibition titled: “Our 2.28: 70 Years After the 2.28 Incident”. The creation of this exhibition coincided with a push to get 2.28 registered as an UNESCO Memory of the World. With the continued development and recognition of the history of Taiwan 2.28 has led to the question about how to educate people about the events, especially their own students. In this paper, an introductory investigation into how various countries handles the teaching of state-sponsored tragic events to their students.