At present, China has nearly 42million Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, accounting for 99% of the total number of enterprises in China, contributing 60% of GDP to the country. The proportion of trade volume of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in international import and export trade reaches 65%. They contribute more than 51% of the tax revenue to the country and provide more than 80% of the jobs. Small and Medium-sized Enterprises have become an important force to expand employment, promote innovation, prosper economy and adjust economic structure. However, since the reform and opening up, China’s Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in the process of market economy development gradually from domestic to overseas. Through a large number of domestic Small and Medium-sized Enterprises continue to open up overseas markets to participate in international trade, which promotes the rapid growth of China’s economy, however Small and Medium-sized Enterprises are also facing a series of problems in the process of developing overseas markets. Relevant governmental subdivision needs to pay attention to this and provide help for the healthy development of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises.
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) and investment-cash flow sensitivity, which is a surrogate for financing constraints.
Research design, data, and methodology – Taking China’s A-share listed companies between 2009 and 2016 as a sample, this paper empirically tests the relationship between CSRD and investment-cash flow sensitivity by Panel VAR model. By introducing the orthogonal impulse response function, this paper distinguishes the fundamental factors and financial ones that affect corporate investment behavior.
Results – Findings indicate that: (1) investment-cash flow sensitivity of firms with low level of CSRD is significantly lower than that of firms with high level of CSRD; (2) the orthogonal impulse response of corporate investment to cash flow in firms with high level of CSRD is significantly different from zero, but it is not significant in firms with low level of CSRD; (3) for firms with low level of CSRD, 0.7% of corporate investment volatility can be explained by the change in cash flow, which is lower than that of firms with high level of CSRD (1.1%).
Conclusions - Corporations disclosing more and higher quality CSRD are often those faced with financing constraints. Voluntary disclosure can help them alleviate information asymmetry and financing constraints.