The aim of this thesis is to evaluate visual art policy during Kookmin government period(1998-2002). In the beginning, many artists had expected president Kim Dae Jung to enlarge arts support But the evaluation of them was very negative vecause the government was only interested in the development of cultural industry. First, I analysed the government expenditure in the visual arts. Department of Culture and Tourism took the responsiblity of visual arts policy. The budget of art and culture increased to 1% of total government expenditure in this period. But the main factor was the increasement of cultural industry and tourism expenditure. The budget of visual arts in 2002 was only 6,600million won. Second, I analysed visual arts support programs. (1) The government introduced studio programs for the first time. For 5 years, 2 mational studios and 23 public studios were established. (2) The number of art museum was increased to 62. (3) It introduced alternative space supported 200million won annually. (4) percent for art scheme reduced from 1% to 0.7% of total construction cost, but still 27 public sculpture gardens were built. (5) Business support for visual arts reduced because of IMF. (6) Also arts marker froze and many commercial galleries were closed. (7) In order to revitalize region through arts and to promote international exchange of culture, Gwangju Biennale was created. Third, I analysed Arts Plan 2002. It had a radical Limitaion because it was established in the last year of Kookmin government period. Also it showed special favors to some arts organizations. In general, I think that positive outcomes are the introductions of the studio program and the alternative space support program. Especially alternative space support program enforced the diversity of visual arts, and encouraged creative young artists. But policy of art market failed because of IMF and visual artists had to go through rough times.

본 연구는 기업의 국제경영활동에 대한 중요한 외생적 환경인 현지국 정부와의 마찰이라는 이론적 모델을 인도네시아 국민차육성적책 사례연구를 통해 분석하였다. 독자모델로 자국산업을 발전시킨 한국과는 달리 다국적기업을 불러들여 자동차산업을 육성한 인도네시아에선 1990년대 중반 미흡한 기술이전 등을 둘러싸고 정부와 현지진출 다국적기업간에 갈등이 발생하였다. 이에 대한 대응으로 인도네시아정부는 독자모델인 `티모르`라는 국민차를 개발하여 이에 특별한 세제상의 혜택을 주며 내국기업이 직접 생산·판매하도록 하고자 하였다. 이는 현지진출 다국적기업의 국제경영활동을 제약하는 것으로 이들 기업의 강한 반발은 물론 투자국의 반발을 초래하고, 결국 IMF 개입과 WTO분쟁해결기구의 결정에 의해 무산되었다. 이 연구결과는 과거와 달리 오늘날의 WTO체제하에서는 다국적기업 경영활동을 일방적으로 규제하려는 현지정부개입은 외부적 제약요인 때문에 실패로 끝나기 쉽다는 것을 말해주고 있다. 이 연구가 우리기업의 국제경영에 주는 시사점은 현지국 정부와의 마찰발생시 한국정부와 전략적 동맹을 맺은 WTO를 통한 대응전략이 국제경영의 위험과 불확실성을 줄여주는 좋은 경영전략이라는 점이다.