Although interest in eco-friendly fashion products is increasing among scholars and industry leaders, the concept of eco-friendly products remains unclear, preventing consistent assessment of which fashion products are eco-friendly. This study conducted a content analysis of eco-friendly product information from 87 domestic and 102 foreign brands to reveal key standards for categorizing eco-friendly fashion products. Product characteristic information was coded according to the four material-based standards (i.e., organic material, regenerative material, alternative material, and sustainably produced/upcycled material). Consistency between coders was confirmed by Cohen’s kappa. In results, eco-friendly fashion products are categorized by four material-based standards and two certification standards (i.e., certified, not certified). Among the four material-based categories, the greatest number of domestic and foreign companies produced eco-friendly products that were classified as the regenerative material group. In addition, companies acquired eco-friendly certifications related to the use of organic, regenerative, and alternative materials. The greatest number of eco-friendly material brands used for eco-friendly fashion products belonged to the regenerative material group. Based on the study results, a typology of eco-friendly products was suggested. This typology can benefit practitioners and academics by highlighting a need for classification system for the eco-friendly fashion products, as well as by providing insight into the categorization of eco-friendly fashion products.

Twenty-nine wetlands (20 river type and 9 lake type wetlands) in Gyeongsangnam-do were investigated to understand the characteristics of fish assemblages by the wetland type and to suggest management strategies. As a result, 10.3±4.8 species were collected from river type wetlands on average (±SD) and 9.1±4.1 species from lake type wetlands. Thus, there was no significant difference in the number of species between them (Mann-Whitney U test, P>0.05). However, the species that constitute the fish assemblage showed statistically significant differences between the two wetland types (PERMANOVA, Pseudo-F=2.9555, P=0.007). Furthermore, the species that contribute the most to each type of fish assemblage were Zacco koreanus (river type, 28.51%) and Lepomis macrochirus (lake type, 23.21%), respectively (SIMPER). The results of the NMDS analysis using the fish assemblage by place classified the species into three groups (river type, lake type, and others). The current wetland management is only focused on endangered species, but this study shows a difference in fish assemblage by wetland type. Therefore, a management system based information on endemic species, exotic species and major contribution species should be provided. Furthermore, the classification of some types of wetlands based on the present topography was found to be ambiguous, and wetland classification using living creatures can be used as a complementary method. This study has limitations because only two types of wetlands were analyzed. Therefore, a detailed management method that can represent every type of wetland should be prepared through the research of all types of wetlands in the future.

국내 주요 도시에서 수행된 비오톱유형 분류는 생물서식처 관점보다는 토지이용 개념에 한정되어 분류되었고, 생태적 가치에 따라 상세하게 분류되지 못하였다. 비오톱유형은 지역적 특성을 고려하여 생물서식처 관점에 따라 분류되어야 한다. 본 논문은 비오톱유형 분류에 사용되는 분류위계, 분류항목, 분류요인, 분류지표, 분류기준, 분류key 등 분류인자의 개념적 틀을 명확하게 설정하고 사례도시의 비오톱유형 분류결과에 적용하여 문제점을 고찰하고 비오톱유형 분류체계 개선방향을 제안하였다. 비오톱유형 분류체계는 위계별로 분류의 기본 수준과 기준을 마련하여 일관된 분류 특성을 가져야 한다. 분류지표는 생물적 요인, 무생물적 요인, 인간행태적 요인을 고려하여 적용되어야 한다. 비오톱유형은 일반인들과 계획가들이 이해하기 쉽도록 분류지표와 분류key의 표준화와 더불어 지역 비오톱 특성을 반영할 수 있도록 분류key와 분류기준의 특성화를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.