The case in this study has positive attitude in understanding the meaning of irresistible state when it comes to rape. This case offered explicit standard of cause and effect between the victim’s disability and irresistible state when offender is in charge of rape. When incidents occur, the victims are deemed able to make certain choices. Because their capacity is clearly vulnerable to external pressures and influences, and their ability to express that choice is undermined by imbalances of power in any given relationship. When the mental disabled victims do not understand what the sexual assault means exactly, it means that they do not have the power of sexual atonomy.