The paper analyzes three artists by looking into their art works; Kim Hongdo and Picasso and Yeats. Kim is the greatest painter Korea has ever seen in history, and Picasso is the greatest painter of the last century, whereas Yeats is the 20th century greatest poet. What they have in common is the literati painting in them. The first two were painters, well versed in poetry. Kim did not create poems, but poems in pictorial images; the best paintings were created toward the end of his life, after a life-long effort to perfect his strokes in calligraphy. His three-pause execution of a stroke is the key to his perfection of his art. When it reaches the limit of perfection in art, its strokes resemble nothing in the world, an astounding feat in art. The effect the sum of strokes makes in a work of his is tantamount to the pure abstraction of soul in Yeats's supreme poetry, and to the pure abstraction, or the pure form of Picasso's painting. It is quite natural that the pure abstraction in Picasso evokes the most beautiful sentiment toward the whole humanity. Picasso's secret to his great art must be his literati temperament in art.

The paper defines two key terms of the last century: Deconstruction and Decreation. Emphasis is put on the second term, as it is useful to understand how Stevens composed his poetry and what he wanted to say about form and content in poetry in a modern context. In his essay "The Relations between Poetry and Painting" he talks about the term Decreation, which means the modern sensibility and mind that eye reality. Stevens' definition of decreation seems to fit well in some of Yeats's poems, the fact of which proves that it can be applied to modern poetry in general, as it has gone through the same soil and climate. Picasso exemplifies and consolidates the usefulness of the terms decreation and deconstruction. Stevens has made one term current and useful for deepening the understanding and appreciation of modern and contemporary poetry, and possibly modern and contemporary art.

기존의 연구에서 제안된 한반도내의 전도성 구조를 정량적으로 해석하기 위해 전도성 구조를 고려한 3차원 지자기 모델링을 수행하였다. 모델링 결과는 관측 유도 지시자를 잘 설명하며, 모델에서 설정된 임진강 벨트와 옥천대의 전도도 구조에 대한 가정이 유의미함을 보여주고 있다. 한반도의 서중부 관측점들(YIN, ICHN)은 임진강 벨트의 영향을 반영하는 것으로 보이며, 한반도 서남부의 관측점들(HNS, CHY, DZN, MWN)은 옥천대의 영향을 반영하는 것으로 보인다. 관측 유도 지시자로부터 해양효과를 제거한 차이 지시자를 계산하였는데, 한반도 서부의 관측점들은 주기 60분에서 관측 유도 지시자와 큰 차이를 보이지 않았고 특히 YIN, ICHN은 주기 10분부터 동일한 양상을 보여 주고 있는데 이러한 결과는 옥천대와 임진강 벨트가 심부까지 확장된 전도성 구조라는 가설을 지지한다.