본 연구는 농촌중심지활성화사업의 목적과 추진전략에 맞추어 사업계획 초기단계에서부터 문제점을 점검할 수 있는 지표를 살펴보고, 농촌중심지 활성화사업에 대한 개선방향을 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구의 결과는 첫째, 중심성 분석결과 중심지구내 계획이 500m구간 내에 설정되어 집중도가 높게 나타나고 있는 지구는 전라남도 옥곡면과 성전면지구와 충남 금산읍지구의 사업들이 집중도가 높게 설정되어 추진되고 있다. 둘째, 하드웨어사업비와 소프트웨어사업비를 년도별로 살펴보면, 기초생활사업비는 전체사업비의 50%이상을 차지하며, 지속적으로 증가하고 있고, 지역경관개선사업비는 지속적으로 20%아래로 줄어들고 있는 실정이다. 반면에 역량강화사업비는 사업의 유지 및 성장동력으로서 지역주민들의 역략강화 프로그램이 지속적으로 개발되고 있다. 셋째, 기초생활기반확충의 하드웨어사업 예산이 비중이 높으므로 증가할 경우 자연히 타사업의 예산이 줄어들고 있다. 사업목적의 성취를 위하여 역량강화사업의 활성화를 꾀하여야 하나 오히려 시행계획단계에서 역량강화사업비가 줄고 있다.

Purpose – Aviation control, navigation, and aircraft control in the air transportation area are very specialized. Each part is in progress for safety, efficiency, automation, and further. On the other hand co-work among each part including knowledge sharing has been inattentive for many reasons. The purpose of this research is to show how practicians and professionals in the air transportation area perceive the issue of knowledge sharing and to recall the necessity of knowledge sharing in the area. And we try to find ways to activate the knowledge sharing in the area. Research design, data, methodology – For the research, we inquired into whether practicians and professionals think knowledge sharing can effect safe aviation positively or not and what steps are necessary to activate knowledge sharing in the area. We adopted survey method using questionnaires for current practicians and interview for specialists. The survey and interview results were analyzed using regression analysis and AHP method. The interview for specialists and analyzing the results using AHP was to investigate what are the precedence factors to activate the knowledge sharing. Results – First, practicians perceive that knowledge sharing will affect aviation safe positively. Second objective knowledges such as, tower air traffic control procedure of aviation control area, flight principle and structure of aircraft control area, instrument landing system of navigation area, for knowledge sharing of each area were identified. Also the precedence factors such as, knowledge absorbability of personal factor, personal expectation of result of expectation factor, leadership of management of Structure factor, method of knowledge spread of application factor for knowledge sharing were found. Conclusions – Knowledge sharing for practicians and professionals in the aviation area is very important especially from the perspective of safety. However, for various many reasons including the environment of each special area that focusing on their own area, knowledge sharing has not been emphasized. We found that practicians in the area feel that knowledge sharing is necessary and helpful. For it, each practician’s active participation is the most important and many ways such as chatting room to share knowledge are to be developed. And the organization culture should be changed to encourage knowledge sharing.