To transport radioactive waste generated during the decommissioning of Kori Unit 1, transport containers of various sizes are being developed. Since these radioactive decommissioning waste transport containers are larger than the specifications of the existing IP-2 type transport containers, which are for operational radioactive waste, design of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI needs to be changed when transporting them to disposal facility using the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI, which carries operational radioactive waste. In this study, design changes of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI, cargo hold modification plan for efficient loading of radioactive decommissioning waste transport containers and radioactive decommissioning waste container loading arrangement (plan) were evaluated during the design life period (year 2034). First, as only the IP-2 type transport container with a weight of 7.5 tons and size of 1.6 m (W) × 3.4 m (L) × 1.2m (H) can be loaded in the cargo hold, if only the decommissioning radioactive waste containers are to be loaded and transported, cargo hold needs to be reinforced. Second, when both the radioactive decommissioning waste transport container of the same size as the current operating radioactive waste transport container, and the radioactive decommissioning waste transport container of the same size as the ISO-type transport container are to be loaded in the cargo hold of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI and transported, the overall design changes (cargo hold size and load reinforcement) are required. Third, since the safe working load of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI crane is 12.5-tons, it shall be replaced with a ship crane of 35-tons or more to handle the decommissioning radioactive waste container smoothly, or a gantry crane used in general port facilities shall be installed. When replacing with a ship crane of 35-tons or more, ship buoyancy, ship stability, and ship structural safety shall be considered. The possibility of moving in all 4 directions for smooth operation, and the possibility of lifting the transport container to a position higher than the height of the CHEONG -JEONG-NURI shall be considered. Loading and transporting all decommissioning radioactive waste containers, which are the same size as IP-2 and ISO-type transport containers, in the cargo hold of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI is uneconomical due to the need for overall design changes (cargo size and load reinforcement, etc.). Also, delay in delivery of the operation wastes is expected due to a long-term design change period. Therefore, it is considered reasonable to load and transport only the decommissioning radioactive waste transport container, which is the same size as the IP-2 transport container, in the cargo hold.

The design life of the radioactive waste carrier, the CHEONG JEONG NURI, is in the year 2034, when the decommissioning of Kori Unit 1 is expected. As only IP-2 type transport containers (7.5- tons, 1.6 m (W) × 3.4 m (L) × 1.2 m (H)) can be loaded onto the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI, the radioactive decommissioning waste (RDW) transport containers neither of 35-tons maximum weight nor ISO type can be accommodated. Accordingly, either a new vessel (NV) to replace the CHEONGJEONG- NURI or a change in the loading dock design of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI is required. In this study, the necessity of building a NV capable of accommodating the issued containers above is analyzed focusing, (1) the estimated building and operating costs of the NV, and (2) the economic feasibility of the NV ‘s RDW transportation scenarios. Among bulk carriers, the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI was designed as handy-size ship type. It is operated reflecting various design requirements to satisfy the domestic/international legal requirements. To estimate the cost of the NV, the same vessel type and design criteria of the CHEONG-JEONGNURI were considered. The shipping price information of the Korea Ocean Business Corporation, as of August 2022, the building cost of bulk carrier Handysize (building NV type) is about USD 30 million. Considering domestic/overseas variables, such as future labor costs, international inflation, interest rate hike, etc., the building costs are expected to continuously rise. Furthermore, vessel operation costs of crew labor, vessel, fuel, and insurance are incurred separately. Due to the increase in oil price, and wages of special positions, such as general seafarers and radiation safety managers, the NV’s operating cost is expected to be about KRW 3.8 billion every year, which is about KRW 1.1 billion higher than that of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI. The expected total cost of building and operating the NV is about KRW 65 billion. Assuming the repayment period of the NV building cost is the same as that of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI building cost reimbursement agency and analyzing the economic feasibility of the transport scenario of the NV built by adding up about KRW 3.8 billion of the operating cost, cost about KRW 880 million per voyage of the NV built is expected, which being KRW 620 million more than the current cost (KRW 260 million) per trip of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI. Therefore, transporting the RDW to the disposal facility through sustainable use of the CHEONGJEONG- NURI (considering design life extension and design change) is evaluated as more appropriate than building NV.