According to acceptance of radioactive waste, homogeneous waste such as concentrated liquid waste and spent resin must be solidified to reduce radiological hazards and protect public health and the ecology. However, when using a High Integrity Containers (HIC), it is stated that homogeneous waste can be disposed of without applying the solidification test requirements. PCHIC, developed in korea, is composed of polyethylene (PE, interior), polymer concrete (PC, filler), and steel (external reinforcement). Currently, PC-HIC will be used as a packaging container for low-level liquid waste and spent resin waste. PE has a lower shielding efficiency compared to PC, but it offers the economic advantage of lower production costs. Therefore, cost savings can be expected if very low-level waste is packaged and disposed of HIC made only of PE materials (PEHIC). Despite the economical advantage of PE-HIC, PE-HIC has not been used domestically since NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) reported that PE-HIC couldn’t meet the mechanical integrity criteria for radiation exsure. However, according to IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) research, it has been reported that mechanical integrity of PE-HIC is not affected when the absorbed dose is below 50 kGy. Therefore, in this study, Radiological impact of VLLW packaged into PE-HIC is evaluated to confirm that the absorbed dose is below 50 kGy, which then be used to assess feasibility of PE-HIC to be used as packaging and disposal container for radioactive waste. Radiological impact of VLLW packaged into PE-HIC is evaluated to confirm that the absorbed dose is below 50 kGy, which then be used to assess feasibility of PE-HIC to be used as packaging and disposal container for radioactive waste. The feasibility of using PE-HIC as packaging-disposal containers for radioactive waste will be reviewed. In this study, the radiation effects of only waste packaged in PE-HIC were considered, and additional assumptions are as follows. - Nuclides subject to radioactivity evaluation: Co-60, Cs-137 - Radioactivity concentration: very low-level radioactive wastel concentration limit - Target waste: waste resin - PE-HIC dimensions: outer diameter: 1,194 mm, height: 1,290 mm, and thickness 88 mm (PCHIC internal PE shape) Considering the above assumption, the exposure rate was evaluated using the MicroShield program. Since the density of PE-HIC in the MicroShield program was assumed as the density of air. The absorbed dose was recalculated through density correction of the derived exposure rate. As a result, it was confirmed that absorbed dose was about 2-3 mGy over 300 years. As a result of dose evaluation by MicroShield, it is judged that the mechanical integrity of PEHIC as an packaging of VLLW can be proved by confirming that the absorption dose irradiated to PE-HIC by internal waste is less than 50 kGy.

The treatment process for Spent Filter(SF) of Kori-1 was developed that includes the following : 1) Taking out by robot system 2) Screening by ISOCS 3) Collection of representative samples using a sampling machine 4) Compression 5) Immobilization 6) Packaging and nuclide analysis and 7) Delivery/disposal. Although the robot system, ISOCS, sampling machine and immobilization facility are essentially required for building the above processing but decision to build the compression system and nuclide analysis system must be made after reviewing the need and cost benefit for their construction. In addition, for effcient SF treatment, it is necessary to determine the nuclide concentration range of the SF to which immobilization will be applied. In this study, a cost benefit analysis was performed on existing and alternative methods for processes related to compression treatment, nuclide analysis and immobilization methods, which are greatly affected by economics and efficiency according to the design. First, although the disposal cost is reduced with reducing the number of packaging drums by compressed and packaged but the expected benefits not be equal to or greater than the cost invested in building a compression system. As a result, non-compressed treatment of SF is expected to be economical because the construction cost of compression system is more expensive than the benefits of reducing disposal costs by compression. Second, a cost benefit analysis of direct and indirect nuclide analysis methods was performed. For indirect analysis, scaling factors should be developed and the drum scanner suitable for the analysis for DAW should be improved. As a result, direct analysis applied grouping options is expected to be more economical than indirect analysis requiring the cost for developing scaling factors and improving the scanner. Third, it is timeconsuming and inefficient to distinguish and collect filters that are subject to be immobilized according to the waste acceptance criteria among the disorderly stored SFs in the filter rooms. If the benefits of immobilization of the SFs selectively are not greater than the benefits of immobilization of all SFs, it can be economical to immobilize all SFs regardless of the nuclide concentration of them. As a result, it is more economical to immobilize all SFs with various nuclide concentrations than to selectively immobilize them. The conclusion of this study is that it is not only cost-effective but also disposal-effective to design the treatment process of SF to adopt non-compressed processing, direct analysis and immobilization of all SFs.

Radioactive waste (hereinafter referred to as mixed waste) containing hazardous substances (heavy metals, organic and inorganic waste liquids, asbestos, etc.) has been continuously generated from domestic nuclear power plants, nuclear facilities, and other industrial facilities, and heavy metals were released during the dismantlement of Kori Unit 1 and Wolseong Unit 1. Lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic), asbestos, decontamination waste liquid (organic/inorganic waste liquid), etc. may be generated. Although hazardous waste related to the nuclear industry continues to be generated, only the regulation direction for hazardous substances is presented in the provisions related to hazardous substances in the delivery regulations for low and intermediate-level radioactive waste and the acceptance criteria for low and intermediate-level radioactive waste disposal facilities. In particular, because there is no clear definition of “hazardousness” and specific standards such as concentration and characteristics for classification of hazardous substances, as well as hazard removal procedures when the hazardousness of radioactive waste is confirmed, no hazardous substances have been delivered in Korea to date and many mixed wastes are stored at each generation facility or at the NPP. As a plan to improve delivery standards related to mixed waste is being prepared recently, it is believed that if the acceptance standards are revised accordingly, it will be possible to confirm the suitability for disposal of drums produced after the establishment of the acceptance standards in 2015. However, it is believed that securing disposal suitability for waste that was packed in 200L drums and compressed under super high pressure in the absence of specific technical standards and regulatory guidelines for the disposal of radioactive waste containing hazardous substances would still remain a difficult problem. In this report overseas acceptance standards related to hazardous waste were reviewed and a plan to secure the disposal suitability of 200 L drums compressed with of super high pressure was proposed.

Every engineering decision in radioactive waste management should be based on both technical and economic considerations. Especially, the management of low-level radioactive waste (LLW) is more critical on economic concerns, due to its long-term and continuous nature, which emphasizes the importance of economic analysis. In this study, economic factors for LLW management were discussed with appropriate engineering applications. Two major factors that should be taken into account when assessing economic expectations are the accuracy of the results and its proper balancing with ALARA philosophy (As Low As Reasonably Achievable). The accuracy of the results depends on the correct application of alternatives within a realistic framework of waste processing. This is because the LLW management process involves variables such as component type, physical dimensions, and the monetary value at the processing date. Two commonly used alternatives are the simplified lump sum present worth and levelized annual cost methods, which are based on annual and capital costs. However, these discussions on alternatives not only pertain to the time series value of operational costs but also to future technical advancements, which are crucial for engineers. As new research results on LLW treatment emerge, proper consideration and adoption should be given to technical cost management. As safety is the core value of the entire nuclear industry, the ALARA philosophy should also be considered in the cost management of LLW. The typical cost of exposure in man-rem has ranged from $1,000 to $20,000 over the past decades. However, with increasing concerns about health and international political threats, the cost of man-rem should be subject to stricter criteria, even the balancing of costs and safety concerns is much controverse issue. Throughout the study, the importance of incorporating proper engineering insights into the assessment of technical value for the financial management of LLW was discussed. However, it’s essential to remember that financial management should not be solely assessed based on the size of expenses but rather by evaluating the current financial status, the value of money at the time, and anticipated future costs, considering the specific context and timeframe.

Activated carbon (AC) is used for filtering organic and radioactive particles, in liquid and ventilation systems, respectively. Spent ACs (SACs) are stored till decaying to clearance level before disposal, but some SACs are found to contain C-14, a radioactive isotopes 5,730 years halflife, at a concentration greater than clearance level concentration, 1 Bq/g. However, without waste acceptance criteria (WAC) regarding SACs, SACs are not delivered for disposal at current situation. Therefore, this paper aims to perform a preliminary disposal safety examination to provide fundamental data to establish WAC regarding SACs SACs are inorganic ash composed mostly of carbon (~88%) with few other elements (S, H, O, etc.). Some of these SACs produced from NPPs are found to contain C-14 at concentration up to very-low level waste (VLLW) criteria, and few up to low-level waste (LLW) criteria. As SACs are in form of bead or pellets, dispersion may become a concern, thus requiring conditioning to be indispersible, and considering VLL soils can be disposed by packaging into soft-bags, VLL SACs can also be disposed in the same way, provided SACs are dried to meet free water requirement. But, further analysis is required to evaluate radioactive inventory before disposal. Disposability of SACs is examined based on domestic WAC’s requirement on physical and chemical characteristics. Firstly, particulate regulation would be satisfied, as commonly used ACs in filters are in size greater than 0.3 mm, which is greater than regulated particle size of 0.2 mm and below. Secondly, chelating content regulation would be satisfied, as SACs do not contain chelating chemicals. Also, cellulose, which is known to produce chelating agent (ISA), would be degraded and removed as ACs are produced by pyrolysis at 1,000°C, while thermal degradation of cellulose occurs around 350~600°C. Thirdly, ignitability regulation would be satisfied because as per 40 CFR 261.21, ignitable material is defined with ignition point below 60°C, but SACs has ignition point above 350°C. Lastly, gas generation regulation would be satisfied, as SACs being inorganic, they would be targeted for biological degradation, which is one of the main mechanism of gas generation. Therefore, SACs would be suitable to be disposed at domestic repositories, provided they are securely packaged. Further analysis would be required before disposal to determine detailed radioactive inventories and chemical contents, which also would be used to produce fundamental data to establish WAC.

Nuclear power plants use ion exchange resins to purify liquid radioactive waste generated while operating nuclear power plants. In the case of PHWR, ion exchange resins are used in heavy water and dehydration systems, liquid waste treatment systems, and heavy water washing systems, and the used ion exchange resins are stored in waste resin storage tanks. The C-14 radioactivity concentration in the waste resin currently stored at the Wolseong Nuclear Power Plant is 4.6×106 Bq/g, exceeding the low-level limit, and if all is disposed of, it is 1.48×1015 Bq, exceeding the total limit of 3.04×1014 Bq of C-14 in the first stage disposal facility. Therefore, disposal is not possible at domestic low/medium-level disposal facilities. In addition, since the heavy water reactor waste resin mixture is stored at a ratio of about 20% activated carbon and zeolite mixture and about 80% waste resin, mixture extraction and separation technology and C-14 desorption and adsorption technology are required. Accordingly, research and development has been conducted domestically on methods to treat heavy water waste resin, but the waste resin mixture separation method is complex and inefficient, and there are limitations in applying it to the field due to the scale of the equipment being large compared to the field work space. Therefore, we would like to introduce a resin treatment technology that complements the problems of previous research. Previously, the waste resin mixture was extracted from the upper manhole and inspection hole of the storage tank, but in order to improve limitations such as worker safety, cost, and increased work time, the SRHS, which was planned at the time of nuclear power plant design, is utilized. In addition, by capturing high-purity 14CO2 in a liquid state in a high-pressure container, it ensures safety for long-term storage and is easy to handle when necessary, maximizing management efficiency. In addition, the modularization of the waste resin separation and withdrawal process from the storage tank, C-14 desorption and monitoring process, high-concentration 14CO2 capture and storage process, and 14CO2 adsorption process enables separation of each process, making it applicable to narrow work spaces. When this technology is used to treat waste resin mixtures in PHWR, it is expected to demonstrate its value as customized, high-efficiency equipment that can secure field applicability and safety and reflect the diverse needs of consumers according to changes in the working environment.

Domestic waste acceptance criteria (WAC) require flowable or homogeneous wastes, such as spent resin, concentrated waste, and sludge, etc., to be solidified regardless of radiation level, to provide structural integrity to prevent collapse of repository, and prevent leaching. Therefore, verylow level (VLL) spent resin (SR) would also require to be solidified. However, such disposal would be too conservative, considering IAEA standards do not require robust containment and shielding of VLL wastes. To prevent unnecessary cost and exposure to workers, current WAC advisable to be amended, thus this paper aims to provide modified regulation based on reviewed engineering background of solidification requirement. According to NRC report, SR is classified as wet-solid waste, which is defined as a solid waste produced from liquid system, thus containing free-liquid within the waste. NRC requires liquid wastes to be solidified regardless of radiation level to prevent free liquid from being disposed, which could cause rapid release of radionuclides. Furthermore, considering class A waste does not require structural integrity, unlike class B and C wastes, dewatering would be an enough measure for solidification. This is supported by the cases of Palo Verde and Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants, whose wet-solid wastes, such as concentrated wastes and sludge, are disposed by packaging into steel boxes after dewatering or incineration. Therefore, dewatering VLL spent resin and packaging them into structural secure packaging could satisfy solidification goal. Another goal of solidification is to provide structural support, which was considered to prevent collapse of soil covers in landfills or trenches. However, providing structural support via solidification agent (ex. Cement) would be unnecessary in domestic 2nd phase repository. As the domestic 2nd phase repository is cementitious structure, which is backfilled with cement upon closure, the repository itself already has enough structural integrity to prevent collapse. Goldsim simulation was run to evaluate radiation impact by VLL SR, with and without solidification, by modelling solidified wastes with simple leaching, and unsolidified wastes with instant release. Both simulations showed negligible impact on radiation exposure, meaning that solidifying VLL SR to delay leaching would be irrational. Therefore, dewatering VLL SR and packaging it into a secure drum (ex. Steel drum) could achieve solidification goals described in NRC reports and provide enough safety to be disposed into domestic repositories. In future, the studied backgrounds in this paper should be considered to modify current WAC to achieve efficient waste management.

For efficient design and manufacture of PWR spent fuel burnup detector, data simulated with various condition of spent fuel in the NPP storage pool is required. In this paper, to derive performance requirements of spent fuel burnup detector for neutron flux and dose rates were evaluated at various distances from CE16 and WH17 types of fuel, representatively. The evaluation was performed by the following steps. First, the specifications of the spent fuel, such as enrichment, burnup, cooling time, and fuel type, were analyzed to find the conditions that emit maximum radioactivity. Second, gamma and neutron source terms of spent fuel were analyzed. The gamma source terms by actinides and fission products and neutron source terms by spontaneous and (α, n) reactions were calculated by SCALE6 ORIGAMI module. Third, simulation input data and model were applied to the evaluation. The material composition and dose conversion factor were referred as PNNL-15870 and ICRP-74 data, respectively and dose rates were displayed with the MCNP output data. It was assumed that there was only one fuel modeled by MCNP 6.2 code in pool. The evaluation positions for each distance were selected as 5 cm, 10 cm, 25 cm, 50 cm, and 1 m apart from the side of fuel, respectively. Fourth, neutron flux and dose rates were evaluated at distance from each fuel type by MCNP 6.2 code. For WH 17 types with a 50 GWd/MTU burnup from 5 cm distance close to fuel, the maximum neutron flux, gamma dose rates and neutron dose rates are evaluated as 1.01×105 neutrons/sec, 1.41×105 mSv/hr and 1.61×101 mSv/hr, respectively. The flux and dose rate of WH type were evaluated to be larger than those of CE type by difference in number of fuel rods. The relative error for result was less than 3~7% on average secured the reliability. It is expected that the simulated data in this paper could contribute to accumulate the basic data required to derive performance requirements of spent fuel burnup detector.

On a global scale, the storage of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) within nuclear power plants (NPP) has become an important research topic due to limited space caused by approaching capacity saturation. SNF have e been collected over decades of NPP operation, coming up to capacity limitation. In case of Korea, every reactor except Saeul 1 and 2 has reached a SNF storage saturation rate of over 75%. One of the most studied methods for enhancing storage capacity efficiency involves increasing storage density using racks with neutron absorbers. Neutron absorbers like borated stainless steel (BSS) are utilized to manage the reactivity of densely stored SNF. However, major challenges of applying BSS are manufacturing hardness from heterogenous microstructure and mechanical property degradation from helium bubble formation. This study suggests that innovative fabrication methods of 3D printing can be good candidate for easier fabrication and better structural integrity of BSS. Directed energy deposition (DED), one of the 3D printing methods have become major candidate method for various alloys. It deposits alloy powder on base melt surface by high intensity laser, similar with welding process. Powder manufacturing is already demonstrated superior performance compared to casting in ASTM-A887, such as increased mechanical properties, owing to its well distributed chemistry of alloy. Moreover, as its original microstructural property, the formation of micro-pores through DED could lead to long-term performance improvements by capturing helium generated from the neutron absorption of boron. The potential for fabricating complex structure is also among the advantages of DED-produced neutron absorbers. Expected challenge on DED application on BSS is lack of printing condition data, because the 3D printing process have to be kept very careful variables of thermal intensity, powder flux and etc. These processes may get through much of trial & error for initial condition approaching. Nonetheless, as a recommendation of improved neutron absorber for efficient SNF pool storage, the concept of 3D printed BSS stands out as an intriguing avenue for research.

Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors (PHWR) have stored ion exchange resins, which are used in deuteration, dehydrogenation systems, liquid waste treatment systems, and heavy water cleaning systems, in spent resin storage tanks. The C-14 radioactivity concentration of PHWR spent resin currently stored at the Wolseong Nuclear Power Plant is 4.6×10E+6 Bq/g, which exceeds the limited concentration of low-level radioactive waste. In addition, when all is disposed of, the total radioactivity of C-14, 1.48×10E+15 Bq, exceeds the disposal limit of the first-stage disposal facility, 3.04×10E+14. Therefore, it is currently impossible to dispose of them in Gyeongju intermediate- and low-level disposal facilities. As to dispose of spent resins produced in PHWR, C-14 must be removed from spent resins. This C- 14 removal technology from the spent resin can increase the utilization of Gyeongju intermediate- and low-level disposal facilities, and since C-14 separated from the spent resin can be used as an expensive resource, it is necessary to maximize its economic value by recycling it. The development of C-14 removal technology from the spent resin was carried out under the supervision of Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power in 2003, but there was a limit to the C-14 removal and adsorption technology and process. After that, Sunkwang T&S, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, and Ulsan Institute of Science and Technology developed spent resin treatment technology with C-14-containing heavy water for the first and second phases from 2015 to 2019 and from 2019 to the present, respectively. The first study had a limitation of a pilot device with a treatment capacity of 10L per day, and the second study was insufficient in implementing the technology to separate spent resin from the mixture, and it was difficult to install on-site due to the enlarged equipment scale. The technology to be proposed in this paper overcomes the limitations of spent resin mixture separation and equipment size, which are the disadvantages of the existing technology. In addition, since 14CO2 with high concentration is stored in liquid form in the storage tank, only the necessary amount of C-14 radioactive isotope can be extracted from the storage tank and be used in necessary industrial fields such as labeling compound production. Therefore, when the facility proposed in this paper is applied for treating mixtures in spent resin tanks of PHWR, it is expected to secure field applicability and safety, and to reflect the various needs of consumers of labeled compound operators utilizing C-14.

The spent filters used to purify radioactive materials and remove impurities from primary systems at nuclear power plants (NPPs) have been stored for long periods in filter storage rooms at NPPs due to concerns about the unproven safety of the treatment method, absence of disposal facilities, and risk of high radiation exposure. In the storage room at Kori Unit 1, there are approximately 227 spent filters of 9 different types. The radiation dose rates of filters range from 0.01 to 500 mSv/hr. Recently, a comprehensive plan has been established for the treatment and disposal of radioactive waste that has not yet been treated to facilitate decommissioning of NPPs. As a follow-up measure, compression and packaging optimization processes are being developed to treat the spent filters. KHNP plans to dispose of the spent filters after compressing, packaging, and immobilizing them. However, the spent filters are currently stored without being sorted by type or radiation intensity. If the removal and packing of the filters are done randomly without a plan for the order of withdrawal and subsequent processes, issues may arise such as a decrease in drum loading efficiency and exceeding the dose limit of the package. In this study, the number of drums needed to pack the spent filters was calculated, considering the filter size, weight, quantity, dose rate, shielding thickness of drum, and loadable quantity in a shielding drum (SD). Then, the spent filters that can be loaded on each drum were classified into one group. In addition, the withdrawal order for each group was set so that the filter withdrawal, compression, and packaging processes could be performed efficiently. The spent filter groups are as follows: (1) compression/12 cm SD (17 groups), (2) compression/16 cm SD (6 groups), (3) non-compression/ intermediate storage container (17 groups, additional radiation attenuation required due to high dose rate), and (4) unclassified (5 groups, determined after measurement due to lack of filter information). The withdrawal order of the groups was determined based on several factors, including visual identification of the filter, ease of distribution after withdrawal, work convenience, and safety. Due to the decay of radioactivity over time, the current dose rate of the spent filters is expected to be much lower than at the time of waste generation. Therefore, in the future, sample filters will be taken from the storage room to measure their radioactivity and radiation dose rate. Based on these measurements, a database of radiological characteristics for the 227 filters will be created and used to revise the filter grouping.

With the recent concern regarding cellulose enhancing radionuclide mobility upon its degradation to ISA, disposal of cellulosic wastes is being held off until the disposal safety is vindicated. Thus, a rational assessment should be conducted, applying an appropriate cellulose degradation model considering the disposal environment and cellulose degradation mechanisms. In this paper cellulose degradation mechanisms and the disposal environment are studied to propose the best-suitable cellulose degradation model for the domestic 1st phase repository. For the cellulose to readily degrade, the pH should be greater than 12.5. As in the case of SKB, 1BLA is excluded from the safety assessment because the pH of 1BLA remains below 12.5. Furthermore, despite cellulose degradation occurring, it does not always produce ISA. At low Ca2+ concentration, the ISA yield rate is around 25%, but at high Ca2+ concentration, the ISA yield rate increases up to 90%. Thus, for the cellulose to be a major concern, both pH and Ca2+ concentration conditions must be satisfied. To satisfy both conditions, the cement hydration must be in 2nd phase, when the porewater pH remains around 12.5 and a significant amount of Ca2+ ion is leaching out from the cement. However, according to the safety evaluation and domestic research, 2nd phase of cement hydration for silo concrete would achieve a pH of around 12.4, dissatisfying cellulose degradation condition like in 1BLA. Thus, cellulose degradation would be unlikely to occur in the domestic 1st phase repository. To derive waste acceptance criteria, a quantitative evaluation should be conducted, conservatively assuming cellulose is degraded. To conduct a safety evaluation, an appropriate degradation model should be applied to determine the degradation rate of cellulose. According to overseas research, despite the mid-chain scission being yet to be seen in the experiments, the degradation model considering mid-chain scission is applied, resulting in an almost 100% degradation rate. The model is selected because the repositories are backfilled with cement, achieving a pH greater than 13, so extensive degradation is reasonably conservative. However, under the domestic disposal condition, where cellulose degradation is unlikely to occur, applying such model would be excessively conservative. Thus, the peeling and stopping model derived by Van Loon and Haas, which suggests 10~25% degradation rate, is reasonably conservative. Based on this model, cellulose would not be a major concern in the domestic 1st phase repository. In the future, this study could be used as fundamental data for planning waste acceptance criteria.

Concerns with colloids, dispersed 1~1,000 nm particles, in the LILW repository are being raised due to their potential to enhance radionuclide release. Due to their large surface areas, radionuclides may sorb onto mobile colloids, and drift along with the colloidal transport, instead of being sorbed onto immobile surfaces. To prevent adverse implications on the safety of the repository, the colloidal impact must be evaluated. In this paper, colloid analysis done by SKB is studied, and factors to be considered for the safety assessment of colloids are analyzed. First, the colloid generation mechanism should be analyzed. In a cementitious repository, due to a highly alkaline environment, colloid formation from wastes may be promoted by the decomposition of organic materials, dissolution of inorganic materials, and corrosion of metals. Radiolysis is excluded when radionuclide inventory is moderate, as in the case of SKB. Second, colloid stability should be evaluated to determine whether colloids remain in dispersion. Stable colloids acquire electric charges, allowing particles to continuously repel one another to prevent coagulation. Thus, stability depends on the pH and ionic condition of the surroundings, and colloid composition. For instance, under a highly alkaline cementitious environment, colloids tend to be negatively charged, repelling each other, but Ca2+ ion from cement, acting as a coagulant, makes colloid unstable, promoting sedimentation. As in the case of SKB, the colloidal impact is assumed negligible in the silo, BMA, and BTF due to their extensive cement contents, but for BLA, with relatively less cement source, the colloidal impact is a potential concern. Third, colloid mobility should be assessed to appraise radionuclide release via colloid transport. The mobility depends on the density and size of colloids, and flow velocity to commence motion. As a part of the assessment, the filtration effect should also be included, which depends on pore size and structure. As in the case of SKB, due to static hydraulic conditions and engineering barriers, acting as efficient filters, colloidal transport is expected to be unlikely. In the domestic underground repository, the highly alkaline environment would lead to colloid formation, but due to high Ca2+ concentration and low flow velocity, colloids would achieve low stability and mobility, thus colloidal impact would be a minor concern. In the future, with further detailed analysis of each factor, waste composition, and disposal condition, reliable data for safety evaluation could be generated to be used as fundamental data for planning waste acceptance criteria.

To transport radioactive waste generated during the decommissioning of Kori Unit 1, transport containers of various sizes are being developed. Since these radioactive decommissioning waste transport containers are larger than the specifications of the existing IP-2 type transport containers, which are for operational radioactive waste, design of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI needs to be changed when transporting them to disposal facility using the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI, which carries operational radioactive waste. In this study, design changes of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI, cargo hold modification plan for efficient loading of radioactive decommissioning waste transport containers and radioactive decommissioning waste container loading arrangement (plan) were evaluated during the design life period (year 2034). First, as only the IP-2 type transport container with a weight of 7.5 tons and size of 1.6 m (W) × 3.4 m (L) × 1.2m (H) can be loaded in the cargo hold, if only the decommissioning radioactive waste containers are to be loaded and transported, cargo hold needs to be reinforced. Second, when both the radioactive decommissioning waste transport container of the same size as the current operating radioactive waste transport container, and the radioactive decommissioning waste transport container of the same size as the ISO-type transport container are to be loaded in the cargo hold of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI and transported, the overall design changes (cargo hold size and load reinforcement) are required. Third, since the safe working load of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI crane is 12.5-tons, it shall be replaced with a ship crane of 35-tons or more to handle the decommissioning radioactive waste container smoothly, or a gantry crane used in general port facilities shall be installed. When replacing with a ship crane of 35-tons or more, ship buoyancy, ship stability, and ship structural safety shall be considered. The possibility of moving in all 4 directions for smooth operation, and the possibility of lifting the transport container to a position higher than the height of the CHEONG -JEONG-NURI shall be considered. Loading and transporting all decommissioning radioactive waste containers, which are the same size as IP-2 and ISO-type transport containers, in the cargo hold of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI is uneconomical due to the need for overall design changes (cargo size and load reinforcement, etc.). Also, delay in delivery of the operation wastes is expected due to a long-term design change period. Therefore, it is considered reasonable to load and transport only the decommissioning radioactive waste transport container, which is the same size as the IP-2 transport container, in the cargo hold.

In preparation for the decommissioning of Kori unit 1 of the nuclear power plant (NPP), new containers of package, transportation, and disposal are being developed that reflect the type, generation amount, and radiological characteristics of decommissioning waste. The containers under development have internal volumes of 1 m3 ~ 14 m3 and loading weights of 1 ton ~ 35 tons, which are larger in size and have a higher loadable weight compared to the 200 L drum and IP-2 type transport container currently being used for packaging and transporting waste. So, there is a limit to handling new containers using existing transport systems (cranes, spreaders, forklifts, transport vehicles, etc.). Therefore, in this study, the status of handling equipment in NPP and disposal facilities was reviewed, the flow from the generation to disposal of decommissioning waste was analyzed, and the possibility of handling new container or the necessity of introducing new systems were derived. Except for some high-dose/high-radioactive wastes among decommissioning wastes, all wastes are finally disposed of through decommissioning area, temporary storage facility, waste treatment facility, waste storage facility, and receipt and storage building. The decommissioning area, temporary storage facility, and waste treatment facility are newly established areas for the decommissioning and should be equipped with a spreader/crane with a lifting weight of 15 tons, 35 tons, and 40 tons in consideration of the weight of the package to be handled in the zone. The waste storage facility has a 7.5 tons crane, so it can handle only some of the lower weight of the 5 to 35 tons package that is expected to be handled. Therefore, additional installation of spreaders/cranes, each with a lifting capacity of 15 tons and 40 tons, is required. The maximum loading weight of forklifts and transport vehicles operating at NPP, and disposal facilities is 10 tons and 12.6 tons, respectively. To transport the package, the facility must additionally install 15 tons and 40 tons forklifts, and 40 tons transport vehicles. Since the lifting weight of the crane installed on the transport vessel is also low at 12.5 tons, it is necessary to change the design of the existing or replace it with 40 tons to handle high-weight package. The results of this study will be used as basic data for the establishment of transport systems in the relevant area and facility, and design requirements for each equipment will be derived through additional research.

The design life of the radioactive waste carrier, the CHEONG JEONG NURI, is in the year 2034, when the decommissioning of Kori Unit 1 is expected. As only IP-2 type transport containers (7.5- tons, 1.6 m (W) × 3.4 m (L) × 1.2 m (H)) can be loaded onto the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI, the radioactive decommissioning waste (RDW) transport containers neither of 35-tons maximum weight nor ISO type can be accommodated. Accordingly, either a new vessel (NV) to replace the CHEONGJEONG- NURI or a change in the loading dock design of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI is required. In this study, the necessity of building a NV capable of accommodating the issued containers above is analyzed focusing, (1) the estimated building and operating costs of the NV, and (2) the economic feasibility of the NV ‘s RDW transportation scenarios. Among bulk carriers, the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI was designed as handy-size ship type. It is operated reflecting various design requirements to satisfy the domestic/international legal requirements. To estimate the cost of the NV, the same vessel type and design criteria of the CHEONG-JEONGNURI were considered. The shipping price information of the Korea Ocean Business Corporation, as of August 2022, the building cost of bulk carrier Handysize (building NV type) is about USD 30 million. Considering domestic/overseas variables, such as future labor costs, international inflation, interest rate hike, etc., the building costs are expected to continuously rise. Furthermore, vessel operation costs of crew labor, vessel, fuel, and insurance are incurred separately. Due to the increase in oil price, and wages of special positions, such as general seafarers and radiation safety managers, the NV’s operating cost is expected to be about KRW 3.8 billion every year, which is about KRW 1.1 billion higher than that of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI. The expected total cost of building and operating the NV is about KRW 65 billion. Assuming the repayment period of the NV building cost is the same as that of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI building cost reimbursement agency and analyzing the economic feasibility of the transport scenario of the NV built by adding up about KRW 3.8 billion of the operating cost, cost about KRW 880 million per voyage of the NV built is expected, which being KRW 620 million more than the current cost (KRW 260 million) per trip of the CHEONG-JEONG-NURI. Therefore, transporting the RDW to the disposal facility through sustainable use of the CHEONGJEONG- NURI (considering design life extension and design change) is evaluated as more appropriate than building NV.

Treatment methods such as interim storage and immobilization are being considered to dispose of intermediate level waste (ILW), but some wastes that have been treated in the past may require repackaging. Re-packaging means to cover repackaging of waste that has already been packaged in a waste container and re-packaging is required for the following reasons: loss of shielding or containment, damage to external handling features, package out-of-specification, insufficient records and external policy. The re-packaging includes various methods such as non-intrusive treatment, overpacking of waste package, external treatment of waste container, repair waste container, injection of stabiliser, disassemble waste package, high temperature process, and dissolve waste package. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the re-packaging possibility for various wastes by identifying the main repackaging methods among the above various re-packaging methods. 1) Disposal outside of the waste container is a viable technique for most packages, as coating with a portable spray gun for low dose rate packages or remotely using a robotic arm for high dose rate packages. 2) Waste container repair is divided into welding repair and patching of waste container according to the degree of damage. Weld repair and patching are important techniques that can be used to add additional shielding, repair damaged areas, and improve the integrity of lifting gears that may not be compliant. 3) In general, disassembly of waste packages has been applied to loose drummed waste. Packages and waste forms are physically disassembled, reduced in size, and placed in different new packages. For practical solution, grouted waste is repackaged by cutting using proprietary equipment such as diamond saws, wire saws, core drilling and rupture techniques. 4) High-temperature process involves cutting the waste package and placing the pieces in a hot bath of inorganic liquid or molten metal, and the process is applicable to all waste types. However, treatment of all gases produced, compliance with waste types and acceptance criteria. Finally, dissolving waste packages, which is generally considered impractical due to the variety of chemicals and radionuclides present in ILW, is a process that is easier to perform on raw ILW than conditioned waste. An example of waste being re-packaged is when old drummed waste is recovered from an old storage facility and the waste needs to be repackaged into a form that meets modern standards for interim storage and disposal.

The treatment of radioactive waste by melting has been mainly discussed with low-level waste (LLW). Considering that a large amount of waste in RV or RVI is intermediate-level waste (ILW), however, it is necessary to examine the possibility of treatment by melting of ILW. Different from LLW, melting of ILW with a high content of long-lived nuclides would lead to no free releasee, but has advantages in volume reduction, homogenization, and delay of release. In this paper, the possibility of melting as an alternative technology for the treatment of ILW in the future is reviewed by analyzing the benefits generated by melting ILW in the following aspects: 1) Similar to melting techniques of LLW, them of ILW are mostly based on well-known techniques, but it is necessary to review the feasibility of performing operations such as removal of solidified melt using remote equipment in abnormal situations such as loss of electricity. 2) It is necessary to specify radiation limits for the melting operation unless the ILW melting operation technique can guarantee that the risk of abnormal occurrence is very low. The main quantified radiation parameter is the ingot dose rate, which of 10 mSv/h is considered more reasonable. 3) Although the treatment of ILW by melting leads to a reduction in volume, the main characteristics of the waste still remain, and no waste can be disposed of for free release. Thus, the main potential benefits are improved long-term safety and reduced waste volume. 4) Reducing the surface-to-volume ratio of the molten material could reduce the amount of corrosive material per unit time and, consequently, increase long-term safety. Its effect on long-term safety is difficult to quantify precisely as it depends on several factors, such as the geometry of the original component or whether radionuclides were distributed on the surface of the original component or the induced radioactivity. 5) The volume reduction of ILW is estimated to be reduced by about 1/4 compared to the generated amount when assuming a disposal volume reduction factor of 3 and considering the dose reduction due to radioactive decay after long-term storage, however, due to the lack of knowledge about non-hazardous facility alternatives, it is difficult to evaluate cost-benefit. This is heavily influenced by both the final volume reduction and the potential to reduce the complexity of the repository’s technical barriers.

Glass wool, the primary material of insulation, is composed of glass fibers and is used to insulate the temperature of steam generators and pipes in nuclear power plants. Glass fiber is widely adopted as a substitute for asbestos classified as a carcinogen. The insulations used in nuclear power plants are classified as radioactive waste and most of the insulation is Very Low-Level Waste (VLLW). It is packaged in a 200 L drum the same as a Dry Active Waste (DAW). In the case of the insulations, it is packaged in a vinyl bag and then charged into the drum for securing additional safety because of the fine particle size of the fiberglass. A safety assessment of the disposal facility should be considered to dispose of radioactive waste. As a result of analyzing overseas Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC), there is no case that has a separate limitation for glass fiber. Also, in order to confirm that glass fibers can be treated in the same manner as DAW, research related to the diffusion of glass fibers into the environment was conducted in this paper. It was confirmed that the glass fiber was precipitated due to the low flow velocity of groundwater in the Gyeongju radioactive waste repository and did not spread to the surrounding environment due to the effect of the engineering barrier. Therefore, the glass fiber has no special issue and can be treated in the same way as a DAW. In addition, it can be disposed of in the disposal facility by securing sufficient radiological safety as VLLW.

In this study, the process of compressing/packaging the spent filters of Kori Unit 1, which was conceptually presented in the previous study, is advanced so that disposal suitability for each step can be secure efficiently. In particular, the differences between the previous study and this study are that the disposable filters are screened using an In-Situ Object Counting System (ISOCS), and the method of collecting representative samples for development of scaling factor is specified. The process of compressing/packaging the spent filters consists of 7 stages as follows. 1) Collecting: The spent filters temporarily stored in the filter room are collected by dose and type remotely using a robot system to minimize the radiation exposure of workers according to a pre-established packaging plan. 2) Screening: The gamma activity concentration of the spent filters received by the robot system is measured by ISOCS. The spent filters below the low-level waste concentration limit and the surface dose are transferred into the compression system, while the others are returned in the filter room again. 3) Sampling: The external perforator drilling/cutting the filter was developed for sampling required for the new scaling factors. Since the sampling is collected remotely, the risk of exposure to workers can be reduced. The newly developed scaling factor will be used to verify the disposal suitability of the packages. 4) Compression: According to the pre-established plan, the spent filter collected by dose and type, is supplied to the compression system considering the dose and radionuclide inventory. Whether to additionally store the compressed filter in the drum is determined by checking the accumulated dose. 5) Immobilization: Immobilization with a safety material is necessary when inhomogeneous wastes, like spent filters, have the total radionuclide concentration with a half-life of more than 20 years is 74,000 Bq/g or more and for filling rate or non-dispersible treatment of particulates. 6) Packaging and Analysis: Waste information is labelled onto the package after the measurements of surface dose rate and surface contamination. Finally, using the drum assay system, the gamma radionuclide concentration is measured to identify at least 95% of the total radioactivity concentration of the package. 7) Temporary Storage and Delivery: The packages are moved to temporary storage in the plant prior to disposal. After establishing the plan for delivery and applying for a takeover request to KORAD, if the acceptance inspection is passed, the packages are transported to the disposal facility.