Treatment methods such as interim storage and immobilization are being considered to dispose of intermediate level waste (ILW), but some wastes that have been treated in the past may require repackaging. Re-packaging means to cover repackaging of waste that has already been packaged in a waste container and re-packaging is required for the following reasons: loss of shielding or containment, damage to external handling features, package out-of-specification, insufficient records and external policy. The re-packaging includes various methods such as non-intrusive treatment, overpacking of waste package, external treatment of waste container, repair waste container, injection of stabiliser, disassemble waste package, high temperature process, and dissolve waste package. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the re-packaging possibility for various wastes by identifying the main repackaging methods among the above various re-packaging methods. 1) Disposal outside of the waste container is a viable technique for most packages, as coating with a portable spray gun for low dose rate packages or remotely using a robotic arm for high dose rate packages. 2) Waste container repair is divided into welding repair and patching of waste container according to the degree of damage. Weld repair and patching are important techniques that can be used to add additional shielding, repair damaged areas, and improve the integrity of lifting gears that may not be compliant. 3) In general, disassembly of waste packages has been applied to loose drummed waste. Packages and waste forms are physically disassembled, reduced in size, and placed in different new packages. For practical solution, grouted waste is repackaged by cutting using proprietary equipment such as diamond saws, wire saws, core drilling and rupture techniques. 4) High-temperature process involves cutting the waste package and placing the pieces in a hot bath of inorganic liquid or molten metal, and the process is applicable to all waste types. However, treatment of all gases produced, compliance with waste types and acceptance criteria. Finally, dissolving waste packages, which is generally considered impractical due to the variety of chemicals and radionuclides present in ILW, is a process that is easier to perform on raw ILW than conditioned waste. An example of waste being re-packaged is when old drummed waste is recovered from an old storage facility and the waste needs to be repackaged into a form that meets modern standards for interim storage and disposal.

The treatment of radioactive waste by melting has been mainly discussed with low-level waste (LLW). Considering that a large amount of waste in RV or RVI is intermediate-level waste (ILW), however, it is necessary to examine the possibility of treatment by melting of ILW. Different from LLW, melting of ILW with a high content of long-lived nuclides would lead to no free releasee, but has advantages in volume reduction, homogenization, and delay of release. In this paper, the possibility of melting as an alternative technology for the treatment of ILW in the future is reviewed by analyzing the benefits generated by melting ILW in the following aspects: 1) Similar to melting techniques of LLW, them of ILW are mostly based on well-known techniques, but it is necessary to review the feasibility of performing operations such as removal of solidified melt using remote equipment in abnormal situations such as loss of electricity. 2) It is necessary to specify radiation limits for the melting operation unless the ILW melting operation technique can guarantee that the risk of abnormal occurrence is very low. The main quantified radiation parameter is the ingot dose rate, which of 10 mSv/h is considered more reasonable. 3) Although the treatment of ILW by melting leads to a reduction in volume, the main characteristics of the waste still remain, and no waste can be disposed of for free release. Thus, the main potential benefits are improved long-term safety and reduced waste volume. 4) Reducing the surface-to-volume ratio of the molten material could reduce the amount of corrosive material per unit time and, consequently, increase long-term safety. Its effect on long-term safety is difficult to quantify precisely as it depends on several factors, such as the geometry of the original component or whether radionuclides were distributed on the surface of the original component or the induced radioactivity. 5) The volume reduction of ILW is estimated to be reduced by about 1/4 compared to the generated amount when assuming a disposal volume reduction factor of 3 and considering the dose reduction due to radioactive decay after long-term storage, however, due to the lack of knowledge about non-hazardous facility alternatives, it is difficult to evaluate cost-benefit. This is heavily influenced by both the final volume reduction and the potential to reduce the complexity of the repository’s technical barriers.

When the decommissioning of a nuclear power plant begins in earnest, starting with Kori Unit 1, it is necessary to dispose of intermediate-level wastes such as high-dose waste filters and waste resin stored in the power plant, as well as the internal structures of the reactor. However, there are no intermediate-level waste disposal facilities in Korea, and the maintenance of acceptance criteria considering the physical, chemical, and radiological characteristics of intermediate-level waste is insufficient. In this paper, in preparation for the establishment of domestic intermediate-level waste treatment/disposal and acceptance standards, the following major foreign countries’ legal and institutional standards for intermediate-level waste are reviewed, and based on this, factors to be considered when establishing domestic intermediate-level waste treatment/disposal standards were derived. First, although the USA does not define and manage intermediate-level wastes separately, low-level wastes were separated into Class A, B, and C, where land disposal is allowed, and GTCC, which does not allow land disposal. However, it was recently confirmed that the position was changed to recognize the possibility of land disposal of GTCC waste under the condition that the dose to inadvertent intruders does not exceed 5 mSv·yr−1 and a barrier against inadvertent intrusion valid for 500 years is installed. Second, Sweden classifies intermediate-level wastes into short-lived and longlived intermediate-level wastes. The maximum dose rate permitted on packages are different for each vault and a silo of the SFR where short-lived wastes; 100 mSv·h−1 or less is disposed of in BMA, 10 mSV·h−1 or less in BTF, 2 mSv·h−1 or less in BLA and 500 mSv·h−1 or less in silo. Meanwhile, a repository for long-lived low and intermediate level waste, SFL, which could contains significant amounts of nuclides with a half-life greater than 31 years, operations are planned to commence in 2045. Third, France also manages short-lived intermediate-level wastes and long-lived intermediatelevel wastes separately, and the short-lived intermediate-level wastes were disposed of together with short-lived low-level wastes at the La Manche and L’Aube repository. France announced the Cigéo Project, a high- and medium-level long-lived waste plan in 2012, and submitted the creation authorization application for in 2021 with the goal of operating a repository in 2025. Finally, the UK defines intermediate-level waste as “waste whose activity level exceeds the upper limit for low-level waste but does not require heating, which is considered in the design of storage or disposal facilities” and established NIREX to provide deep disposal of intermediate-level radioactive waste. In Finland, wastes with radioactive concentrations of 1 MBq/kg to 10 GBq·kg−1 are classified as intermediatelevel wastes, and a repository was constructed and operated in a bedrock of about 110 m underground. Because the domestic classification standard simply classifies intermediate-level waste as waste exceeding the activity level of low-level waste limit, not high-level wastes, it is necessary to establish treatment and disposal standards by subdividing them by dose rate and long-lived radionuclides concentration to safely and efficiently dispose of intermediate-level waste for. Additionally, there is a need to decide whether or not to reflect safety by inadvertent intruders when evaluating the safety of intermediate-level disposal.

한국방사성폐기물관리공단 주관 하에 개념 설계된, 연소도이득효과 적용 대용량 수송용기에 대해 방사 선 차폐 안전성을 평가하였으며 여러 방사선원들이 수송용기 주변 선량률 분포에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 가능한 모든 방사선원(중성자선원, 감마선원, 방사화선원)들을 고려하였으며 보수적인 가상의 핵 연료(너비: WH 17 RFA, 축방향: CE Type)를 선정, 실제 상황과 동일한 조건이 되도록 계산모델을 구축 하였다. 모든 조건(정상 및 가상사고 조건)에서 표면선량률과 외부선량률이 법적기준치를 만족하고 있었 으며 축방향 높이에 따라 각 선원들의 기여도가 변하고 있었지만 정상조건에서의 최대 표면선량률과 외 부선량률은 방사화선원에 의한 영향이 가장 높은 것으로 확인되었다. 가상사고 조건에서는, 중성자선원 의 선량률 기여도가 대략 90%에 달하고 있었으나 수송용기 끝단에서는 방사화선원에 의한 선량률이 급 격하게 상승함에 따라 BUC 적용 수송용기의 방사선 차폐해석시 충분히 보수적으로 해석되도록 방사화선 원을 정밀하게 분석하여 설정하여야 할 것으로 판단되었다.