The treatment process for Spent Filter(SF) of Kori-1 was developed that includes the following : 1) Taking out by robot system 2) Screening by ISOCS 3) Collection of representative samples using a sampling machine 4) Compression 5) Immobilization 6) Packaging and nuclide analysis and 7) Delivery/disposal. Although the robot system, ISOCS, sampling machine and immobilization facility are essentially required for building the above processing but decision to build the compression system and nuclide analysis system must be made after reviewing the need and cost benefit for their construction. In addition, for effcient SF treatment, it is necessary to determine the nuclide concentration range of the SF to which immobilization will be applied. In this study, a cost benefit analysis was performed on existing and alternative methods for processes related to compression treatment, nuclide analysis and immobilization methods, which are greatly affected by economics and efficiency according to the design. First, although the disposal cost is reduced with reducing the number of packaging drums by compressed and packaged but the expected benefits not be equal to or greater than the cost invested in building a compression system. As a result, non-compressed treatment of SF is expected to be economical because the construction cost of compression system is more expensive than the benefits of reducing disposal costs by compression. Second, a cost benefit analysis of direct and indirect nuclide analysis methods was performed. For indirect analysis, scaling factors should be developed and the drum scanner suitable for the analysis for DAW should be improved. As a result, direct analysis applied grouping options is expected to be more economical than indirect analysis requiring the cost for developing scaling factors and improving the scanner. Third, it is timeconsuming and inefficient to distinguish and collect filters that are subject to be immobilized according to the waste acceptance criteria among the disorderly stored SFs in the filter rooms. If the benefits of immobilization of the SFs selectively are not greater than the benefits of immobilization of all SFs, it can be economical to immobilize all SFs regardless of the nuclide concentration of them. As a result, it is more economical to immobilize all SFs with various nuclide concentrations than to selectively immobilize them. The conclusion of this study is that it is not only cost-effective but also disposal-effective to design the treatment process of SF to adopt non-compressed processing, direct analysis and immobilization of all SFs.

In this study, the process of compressing/packaging the spent filters of Kori Unit 1, which was conceptually presented in the previous study, is advanced so that disposal suitability for each step can be secure efficiently. In particular, the differences between the previous study and this study are that the disposable filters are screened using an In-Situ Object Counting System (ISOCS), and the method of collecting representative samples for development of scaling factor is specified. The process of compressing/packaging the spent filters consists of 7 stages as follows. 1) Collecting: The spent filters temporarily stored in the filter room are collected by dose and type remotely using a robot system to minimize the radiation exposure of workers according to a pre-established packaging plan. 2) Screening: The gamma activity concentration of the spent filters received by the robot system is measured by ISOCS. The spent filters below the low-level waste concentration limit and the surface dose are transferred into the compression system, while the others are returned in the filter room again. 3) Sampling: The external perforator drilling/cutting the filter was developed for sampling required for the new scaling factors. Since the sampling is collected remotely, the risk of exposure to workers can be reduced. The newly developed scaling factor will be used to verify the disposal suitability of the packages. 4) Compression: According to the pre-established plan, the spent filter collected by dose and type, is supplied to the compression system considering the dose and radionuclide inventory. Whether to additionally store the compressed filter in the drum is determined by checking the accumulated dose. 5) Immobilization: Immobilization with a safety material is necessary when inhomogeneous wastes, like spent filters, have the total radionuclide concentration with a half-life of more than 20 years is 74,000 Bq/g or more and for filling rate or non-dispersible treatment of particulates. 6) Packaging and Analysis: Waste information is labelled onto the package after the measurements of surface dose rate and surface contamination. Finally, using the drum assay system, the gamma radionuclide concentration is measured to identify at least 95% of the total radioactivity concentration of the package. 7) Temporary Storage and Delivery: The packages are moved to temporary storage in the plant prior to disposal. After establishing the plan for delivery and applying for a takeover request to KORAD, if the acceptance inspection is passed, the packages are transported to the disposal facility.

Currently, treatment and disposal suitability verification methods have not been established for radioactive waste, such as spent filters temporarily stored in each plant, so the WCP (Waste Certification Program) can be applied to verify the suitability of non-conforming waste at the site. In this study, WCP components such as certification organizations, certification methods, certification documents, and quality assurance (QA) plan that should be considered when developing WCP applicable to spent filter disposal were reviewed and presented. First, a certification organization consists of a certification organization that performs certification work, a certification support organization related to waste generation and treatment, and a quality control organization for waste certification. Especially, the support organization should support the implementation of WCP, so that spent filter processing procedures such as generation information management and immobilization can be properly packaged and transported. Second, in identifying the waste characteristics of the certification method, each characteristic identification procedure and certification method of the acceptance criteria should be described, evidence examining the suitability of general, radiological, physical, chemical, and biological requirements, and processes related to measurement and sampling should be established. In identifying characteristics, satisfaction of waste form, free water requirements, and whether it is subject to immobilization should be checked priorly, and a method of confirming particulate matter and securing filling rate when packaging compressed filters should be included. It is very important to develop a technology for verifying the safety and quality of the immobilized material because immobilization of the filters can be a processing method that satisfies various characteristic criteria. Meanwhile, it is essential to collect samples and develop scaling factors to identify the nuclides of filters and prove that they are below the concentration limits. For chemical and biological requirements, the characteristics are identified through generation information documents, corrective actions are taken and documented in case of nonconformance. Third, certification documents should include immobilization procedure manual, characteristic report, and characteristic test manuals such as free water, particulate matter and filling rate, radiation measurement method manual for packages, profile, and generation documents. Fourth, the QA plan should analyze the QA system of the plants, check the QA inspection details, establish general requirements for QA of spent filter disposal, and specify step-by-step certification work QA activities. In this study, considerations to ensure the disposal suitability at all stages from generation to disposal of spent filter were presented, and development of a WCP could contribute to preventing nonconformance.

As the decommissioning of Kori Unit 1 progresses, securing technology for treatment and disposal of radioactive wastes that have not been disposed of so far, such as spent filters, is recognized as an urgent task. In this study, a method of confirming the disposal suitability of spent filters was presented by reviewing the waste characteristics as presented in the waste acceptance criteria (WAC). The waste characteristics to be satisfied to ensure disposal suitability of waste are largely classified into general requirements, solidification and immobilization requirements, radiological requirements, physical requirements, chemical requirements, and biological requirements. First, the general requirement is to prove that the prohibited waste form has not been introduced into items related to waste form and packaging, and to confirm the suitability of disposal through step-by-step packaging photos, generation information, X-ray inspection, and visual inspection. Second, in the solidification and immobilization requirements, spent filters are non-homogeneous waste, and if the total radioactivity concentration of nuclides with a half-life of more than 20 years is 74,000 Bq·g−1 or more, they must be immobilized. Third, in order to meet the characteristic criteria for nuclides and radioactivity concentration, sampling and scaling factors development are required and based on this, nuclides must be identified and demonstrated to be below the disposal concentration limits. Surface dose rate and surface contamination should be measured in accordance with standardized procedures and disposal suitability should be confirmed through document tests recording the measured values. Fourth, in order to satisfy the physical requirements of the particulate matter and filling rate characteristics, the spent filter must be immobilized, if necessary, thereby ensuring disposal suitability. Meanwhile, free water in the spent filter should be removed through pre-drying and dehydration, and the disposal suitability should be confirmed by applying a test. Fifth, the criteria for chelating agents should be checked for disposal suitability through operation records and component analysis of spent filters, and documents, that can prove harmful substances are removed in advance and no harmful substances are included in the package, should be provided. Lastly, in biological requirements, if the spent filters contain corrosive or infectious substances, they should be removed in advance and disposal suitability should be confirmed by providing documents that can prove that such substances are not included in the package.

This study established a process to ensure the disposal suitability of spent filters stored in the untreated state in Kori unit 1 and presented the following procedures and requirements for confirming the disposal suitability for each process. The process for securing spent filter disposal suitability consists of collecting spent filters, compression, immobilization, analysis and packaging, and storage stages. The requirements for confirming the acceptance criteria for each process are as follows. (1) Collecting: Since the high radioactivity spent filters are being stored in the filter room of Kori unit 1, those are collected by a remote system to minimize the exposure dose of workers due to spent filter handling. In order to satisfy the surface dose rate requirements, spent filters with a surface dose rate of 10 mSv·hr−1 or more are classified and collected, and stored temporary storage place until a separate treatment plan is determined. The checkpoints in this process are the surface dose rate, etc. (2) Compression: The collected spent filters are analyzed gamma nuclides such as Co-60 and Cs-137, using a field-applicable nuclide analyzer, and then applying the scaling factors to determine whether it is disposable. Spent filters whose radioactivity concentration is confirmed to be less than the disposal concentration limit is compressed into compression ratios determined by surface dose rate. The checkpoints in this process are nuclide information, surface dose rate, compression ratio, spent filter loading quantity, etc. (3) Immobilization: A spent filter is a non-homogeneous waste that is immobilized with a proven safety material such as cement if the total radioactivity concentration of nuclides with a half-life of more than 20 years is 74,000 Bq·g−1. Meanwhile, immobilization of inhomogeneous waste can be considered to satisfy disposal criteria such as particulate matter and filling rate. The checkpoints in this process are the immobilizing material, filling rate, etc. (4) Analysis and Packaging: Immobilized drums shall be determined to be 95% or more of the total radioactivity of waste packages by measuring the radioactivity concentration of nuclides using a nuclide analysis device. Finally, measure the surface dose rate and surface contamination of the package, and attach the package label recording the identification number, date, total radioactivity, surface dose rate, and surface contamination information to the packaging container. (5) Storage: Packaging containers are moved to and stored in a temporary waste storage or storage area before disposal.