본 연구의 목적은 기업 비전이 추구하는 개념과 기업의 재무적 성과 간 관계를 디지털 전환을 중심으로 고찰하 기 위한 것이다. 경영학의 선행연구는 비전의 중요성을 기업가정신이나 경영전략 측면에서 강조하고 기업성과에 대한 비전의 영향력을 강조함으로써 경영학의 발전에 일조하였다. 그런데 본 연구는 비전과 기업의 재무적 성과 간 관련성을 규명함으로써 선행연구와 차별화하였으며, 비전이 기업의 재무적 성과에 미치는 효과에 대해 검증하 는 데 의의를 두었다. 연구 방법은 우리나라 KOSPI에 등록된 331개 기업을 대상으로 기업의 재무적 성과를 정량적으로 파악하여 분석하고, 이를 근거로 각 기업의 비전과 상관관계를 분석하였다. 상기한 연구 목적에 따라 분석한 결과 기업의 재무적 성과와 디지털 전환(디지털, 혁신, ICT, Innovator, 신 비즈니스) 관련 변수는 양(+)의 상관관계를 확 인했으며, 구체적인 목표(Special Target) 관련 변수도 양(+)의 상관관계가 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이 결과를 통해 다음과 같은 경영상의 함의를 도출할 수 있다. 디지털 기술 자체가 기업 경쟁력을 결정하는 중요한 요소이 고 이를 활용하는 것이 기업 성장의 원동력이므로 조직의 문제나 고객의 문제해결에 디지털 기술을 적극적으로 활용하면 기업의 재무적 성과에 긍정적인 요인이 될 수 있다는 것을 보여준다. 또한, 성장․미래․가치와 같은 추상적이고 분명하지 않은 비전 내용은 기업의 경영성과에 도움이 되지 않는다는 것을 알 수 있으며, 비전 속성 을 정할 때 구체적인 목표치를 제시해야 경영성과에 긍정적 효과를 줄 수 있다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

As the competitiveness of SMEs (small and medium enterprises) is getting more and more improved and globalized, the government provides various consulting services to secure the competitiveness of small and medium firms and support stable growth. However, the assessment of the result from the government’s support is generally focused on non-financial factors, such as customer satisfaction and analysis of improvement effect. This paper is in regards to the statistical analysis of how much the government’s support in the form of providing consulting services contributes to financial outcomes in terms of profitability and growth. ROA (return on asset) and ROS (return on sales), which are investment profitability and sales profitability respectively, are chosen as an indicator of profitability. For analysis of growth, sales revenue and total asset growth are used. The samples are 44 corporations which are supported by government, and 150 corporations which are selected for comparison, with corporate growth support center program by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy chosen as the consulting model. After gathering the yearly balance sheets and income statements of the samples from CRETOP, Korea Enterprise Data, the analysis is conducted in the way of identifying the statistical significance of financial difference in the same period between corporates taking consulting services and corporates which have not, and the difference of financial outcomes from the corporates taking consulting services before and after consulting services. As a result, in terms of business growth, it is turned out to have positive difference both in growth ratio and profitability compared to the compared corporations at the significant level. Therefore, it is obvious that the consulting program which government provides to SMEs have direct influence practically to the corporates’ management performance.

Though their activities, companies have an impact on environmental problems and nature conservation. The accounting sector can play a role in environmental conservation efforts related to environmental costs, and the implemention of the Corporate Sustainability Management System (CSMS) could be a key factor that can improve the company’s financial performance. This study aims to determine how green accounting through the application of CSMS can improve the financial performance of manufacturing companies in Indonesia, a developing country. The sampling method used was purposive sampling, while the research sample consisted of 38 companies that had followed PROPER and were indexed on the IDX. Data were analyzed using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method known as the Partial Least Square (PLS) method. The results of this study indicate that manufacturing companies in Indonesia are able to implement green accounting by allocating appropriate environmental costs by earmarking a portion to carry CSMS implementation so as to improve financial performance. People in Indonesia consider that manufacturing companies that have good company rankings in the evaluation program for company performance ratings in environmental management run by the Indonesian Ministry of Environment are in a position to generate customer loyalty, especially in financial performance.

This research aims to examine (1) the effect of carbon emission disclosure on firm value, (2) the effect of good corporate governance on firm value, (3) the mediating role of financial performance between carbon emission disclosure and firm value, and (4) the mediating role of financial performance between good corporate governance and firm value. The research sample includes 43 mining, agro, and manufacturing firms listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange over the 2015-2017 period. Carbon emission disclosure is measured by an indicator of the Global Reporting Initiative Series of Environmental Aspect. Good corporate governance is measured by the corporate governance score of shareholder rights, boards of directors, outside directors, audit committee and internal auditor, and disclosure to investors. Financial performance is measured by return on assets, while firm value is measured by Tobin’s Q. Data analysis uses the structural equation modeling. The result shows carbon emission disclosure and good corporate governance have no direct effect on firm value. On the other hand, financial performance mediates the effect of carbon emission disclosure and good corporate governance on firm value. It shows that higher carbon emission disclosure and good corporate governance are meaningless for the investor if they do not give any financial performance improvement.