In the Korean Building Code (KBC), the Design Eccentricity involves the torsional amplification factor (TAF), and the inherent and accidental eccentricities. When a structure of less than 6-stories and assigned to seismic design category C or D is designed using equivalent static analysis method, both KBC-2006 and KBC-2009 use the TAF but apply different calculation methods for the of design eccentricity. The design eccentricity in KBC-2006 is calculated by multiplying the sum of inherent eccentricity and accidental eccentricity at each level by a TAF but that in KBC-2009 is calculated by multiplying only the accidental eccentricity by a TAF. In this paper, the damage indices of a building with planar structural irregularity designed by different design eccentricities are compared and the relationship between the earthquake damage and design eccentricity of the building is evaluated. On the basis of this study, the increment of design eccentricity results in the decrement of final eccentricity and global damage index of structure. It is observed that design eccentricity in KBC-2006 reduces the vulnerability of torsional irregular building compared to design eccentricity in KBC-2009.

본 논문에서는 구조물의 안전성과 경제성을 함께 도모하도록 하기 위하여 모드 해석법을 이용하여 비틀림 거동을 하는 구조물의 동적 거동을 정적 하중으로 치환할 경우에 대한 횡하중 중심점을 가정하고, 횡하중 중심점과 구조물의 강도 중심을 일치시키도록 구조물의 설계 편심을 조절하는 방법을 제안한다. 그리고 제안된 방법에 의해 구조물을 설계하였을 경우, 다른 내진 기준에 의해 설계된 구조물과 비교하여 지나친 추가 연성도를 요구하지 않는다는 것을 보여준다.