In this study, dual drainage system based runoff model was established for W-drainage area in G-si, and considering the various rainfall characteristics determined using Huff and Mononobe methods, the degree of flooding in the target area was analyzed and the risk was compared and analyzed through the risk matrix method. As a result, the Monobe method compared to the Huff method was analyzed to be suitable analysis for flooding of recent heavy rain, and the validity of the dynamic risk assessment considering the weight of the occurrence probability as the return period was verified through the risk matrix-based analysis. However, since the definition and estimating criteria of the flood risk matrix proposed in this study are based on the return period for extreme rainfall and the depth of flooding according to the results of applying the dual drainage model, there is a limitation in that it is difficult to consider the main factors which are direct impact on inland flooding such as city maintenance and life protection functions. In the future, if various factors affecting inland flood damage are reflected in addition to the amount of flood damage, the flood risk matrix concept proposed in this study can be used as basic information for preparation and prevention of inland flooding, as well as it is judged that it can be considered as a major evaluation item in the selection of the priority management area for sewage maintenance for countermeasures against inland flooding.

In this study, dual drainage system based runoff model was established for W-drainage area in G-si, and considering the various rainfall characteristics determined using Huff and Mononobe methods, the degree of flooding in the target area was analyzed and the risk was compared and analyzed through the risk matrix method. As a result, the Monobe method compared to the Huff method was analyzed to be suitable analysis for flooding of recent heavy rain, and the validity of the dynamic risk assessment considering the weight of the occurrence probability as the return period was verified through the risk matrix-based analysis. However, since the definition and estimating criteria of the flood risk matrix proposed in this study are based on the return period for extreme rainfall and the depth of flooding according to the results of applying the dual drainage model, there is a limitation in that it is difficult to consider the main factors which are direct impact on inland flooding such as city maintenance and life protection functions. In the future, if various factors affecting inland flood damage are reflected in addition to the amount of flood damage, the flood risk matrix concept proposed in this study can be used as basic information for preparation and prevention of inland flooding, as well as it is judged that it can be considered as a major evaluation item in the selection of the priority management area for sewage maintenance for countermeasures against inland flooding.

기후 변화로 인한 국지성 호우의 증가로 도시의 내수침수피해가 증가함에 따라 이중배수체계 모형의 중요성이 증가하였다. 이중배수체계 모형은 지표면의 흐름과 관거의 흐름의 현상을 보다 정확히 표현하기 위하여 표면유출과 관거 유출을 각각의 관련 방정식과 매개변수들을 통해 해석하며, 이를 시각별로 연동하여 동시에 시뮬레이션하는 모형으로 이중배수체계 모형의 침수해석 결과는 도시계획 및 침수예방을 위한 계획 수립시 중요한 자료로 사용 되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 자연유역과 도시유역이 혼재되어 있는 복합유역에 이중배수체계를 접목하여 해석이 가능한 COBRA 모형을 실제 유역에 적용하여 그 적용성을 파악해 보고 다른 이중배수체계 모형인 XP-SWMM, UFAM과 비교하여 결과의 적합성을 판단해 보았다. 동일한 대상유역에 대해 3가지 형태의 이중배수체계 모형의 침수해석 결과 및 침수양상을 분석한 결과를 종합해볼 때 우수관망의 용량 부족으로 발생하는 내수침수 특징은 XP-SWMM이 비교적 잘 모의하는 것으로 보였으며, UFAM은 도로의 빗물받이를 고려하는 특징에 따라 타 모형에 비해 가장 낮은 침수해석 결과를 나타내었다. 마지막으로 COBRA는 침수면적과 침수면적의 비율, 최대침수심이 강우량 증가에 비례하는 일반적인 결과와 토양조건에 따라 유효우량을 세밀하게 분류하여 모의하는 모형 특성 및 지표 저류에 의한 침수양상이 나타나는 현실성을 고려할 때 모형의 안정성 측면에서 양호하다고 판단되었다.