The purpose of this paper is to reconsider the problems in the Korean Exceptional Case Marking (ECM) Constructions and to suggest that the ECM constructions are best analyzed if we assume that the ECM constructions can function as the simple sentence following Woo (1995). Under this analysis, adopting the multiple case licensing conducted by Hiraiwa (2001), it is shown why and how the DPs in question in the ECM constructions can be case-marked exceptionally and normally.