Many parrots are considered endangered species due to threats from human activities. Gender determination is of great importance for biological studies and the conservation of endangered parrots. However, like other birds, gender determination in parrots is hindered due to the lack of external dimorphism between males and females. A molecular approach using the chromo-helicase-DNA binding protein 1 (CHD1) gene is commonly used for sexing birds. This study aimed to determine the gender of parrots from Korean zoos based on amplification and visualization of the partial CHD1 gene. The samples of 13 parrot species were collected from three different zoos in Korea and the extracted DNA templates were amplified using CHD1 gene primers. The gender of 27 samples of 13 species was determined by visualizing the PCR products on an agarose gel. While male parrots were indicated by a single band, female parrots were indicated by double bands. The findings provide additional information, which might be helpful for the management and care of parrots in Korean zoos.

The Supreme Court of Korea has adopted a methodology of rigorous grammatical interpretation in order to satisfy the Constitutional requirement of law-binding in judgement of criminal case. However, the principle of law-binding does not mean the so-called ‘legal state.’ For this reason, the national justice system of the law recognizes the supplements of the judiciary. This article observes criminal judgement that the Supreme Court of Korea is suspected of going beyond just a supplementary role to ‘judicial justice’. As a result of analyzing the criminal judgment, the Supreme Court found that the following folly is used in using deductive syllogism. First, Producing of non-existent premise. Second, Arbitrary manipulating or processing of a premise. Third, excessive normative interpretation of a premise. Fourth, Formulating of general clause. Therefore, this article emphasizes the task of criminal law discipline which should prevent the judicial branch from walking the way of judicial jurisdiction by critically examining the various act of manipulation of Supreme Court which is carried out in the name of providing the legal basis for the preconceived conclusion in the deduction process.

This study re-examined the issues of Korean binding domain investigated in the previous studies (Kim and Yoon 2009, Kim 2013) by testing the validity of Tensed S Condition (TSC) in Korean binding. Hypothesizing that Korean TSC-violating anaphors are indeed exempt anaphors, the current study is designed to fix the problems of the previous studies. Twenty seven Korean native speakers were tested over Acceptability Judgment Task combined with Interpretation Task composed of 155 Korean sentences representing various binding conditions and Korean local anaphors. Overall results showed that Korean native speakers treat sentences with TSC-violating anaphors similarly to those with SSC-violating anaphors rather than the sentences representing local binding, which means that TSC-violating local anaphors are licensed as exempt anaphors in Korean, not core anaphors.