본 연구는 지금까지 추진되어 왔던 전통테마마을 사업의 추진성과를 분석하기 위해 인적 요소, 경제적 요소, 사회적 요소 등으로 구성된 평가지표를 개발하였다. 평가지표에 대한 객관성을 확보하기 위해 전 문가를 대상으로 AHP법을 이용하여 중요도 평가를 실시하였다. 평가지표의 중요도는 주민만족도 (150), 주민참여도 (145), 경제적효과 (123), 민박가구수 (101), 리더양성정도 (96), 사업이해도 (90) 순으로 나타났 다. 6개 마을에 적용한 결과, 해바리마을, 다랭이마을, 남사예담촌, 물레방아떡마을, 산첩렵마을 순으로 평가량이 산정되었다. 농촌마을 간의 균형적인 발전을 도모하기 위해 인적 측면, 경제적 측면, 사회적 측 면에서 개선방안을 제시하였다.

As government and local governments are working on the various project about rural experience tourism village in these days, many rural villages are planned and developed, and try to come up to visitor’s demand. Not only quantitative growth by village development but also importance of programs operated by the rural villages are emphasized, therefore it needs to compare and analyze the activity programs about rural experience tourism village in rural community building business by season, characteristics of villages, and overall. Moreover, it has to try to suggest a basic direction of improvement about rural community building business. The site of researches are 15 villages that include 5 green rural tourism villages, 5 rural traditional theme villages, and 5 unique villages that are recent project. The result of research is that similar projects are operated and hard to find characteristic of seasonal programs in existing management business. On the other hand, the programs of recent management business operates not only the former program but also big and activity program using the village’s resources and characteristic.

After the 2000's, the rural village development projects are designated as participatory rural village development programs and projects. The purpose of this study is to draw a scheme to facilitate resident's participation in rural village development project by exploring the factors influencing resident's participation. For this, in Namsa rural theme village in Dansung-myon, Sanchung-gun, Kyongnam Province, the data were collected through field surveys and interviews residents residing in this village. In addition, observations studies and an opinion survey of the persons concerned in the presentation meetings were also conducted. I investigated and analysed the activation factors and the characteristics of residents' participation, and amenity resources which were essential for community planning including the planning-establishment, theme-searching and development of experience program. Through this study, I drew findings as follows; 1) The leader's leadership and residents' positive participation are very important activation factors in the first stage of rural viability. 2) And then, the external support and concern, the establishment of short-and long-term community planning, and the rural-income increase through the development of amenity resources play important roles as activation factors in the successive stage of rural viability. Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations were made. In order to improve the level of resident's participation in rural village development programs and projects, it is necessary to evaluate their successes, failure, barriers and the positive correlation between their success more delicately. In addition to this, it must be suggested the better model for participatory rural village development programs for the further enhancement and improvement of rural village development projects.

The purpose of this study is to propose the principle of rural village planning process based on rural resources, differently space planning process(regional planning, village planning, urban planning etc). The importance of this planning process is resources planning, facility planning, program planning. So we planed rural villages - two rural traditional theme villages. The major findings of this planning were as follows; First, we have to consider economic value of rural resources. Second, resources were used differently, according to village conditions, though same it. It is important to apply value-added it. Third, in future we have to additional studies; environment planning factor, community participation, resources evaluation in this planning.