90년대 후반 이후 농촌관광에 대한 수요와 관심이 높아지면서 농촌관광과 연관된 연구가 다방면으로 증가하게 되었고 이 가운데 농촌관광자원의 유형을 구분하는 연구도 늘어나게 되었다. 어느 분야를 막론하고 대상 자체의 유형을 구분하는연구는 해당 주제에 대한 체계적인 이해를 돕기 위한 초석을 만드는데 크게 기여해왔다. 농촌관광자원의 유형을 구분하는연구는 꾸준히 진행되어왔지만 소비자들의 직접적인 의견이 반영되지 않은 채 전문가적 관점이나 통계적 유사성에 의거하여분류되어왔던 것이 사실이다. 이러한 배경 하에 본 연구는 실제 관광자원을 이용하는 이용자 중심의 시각에서 체험 중심의 농촌관광자원의 유형을 분류하였다. 이를 위하여 농촌어메니티자원 DB를 기초자료로 활용하여 마을별 관광자원을 수집하고카드 분류법(card sorting test)을 실시하였다. 카드 분류법의 피조사자는 농촌관광의 경험이 있는 대학생 32명을 선정하여진행되었으며 최종적으로 전문가 설문을 통하여 농촌자원유형 분류를 검증하였다. 조사 결과 상위 항목에서는 ‘체험하기’,‘지역향토음식 먹기/만들기’, ‘숙박하기’, ‘주변관광/경관감상’, ‘레져 즐기기’, ‘예술활동하기’의 6가지 유형으로 분류되었다.하위항목에서는 상위항목의 ‘체험하기’에서만 분리되는 특징을 보였으며 ‘지역자원활용체험’, ‘자연체험’, ‘전통체험’, ‘수확/채집체험’의 4가지 유형으로 분류되는 특징을 보였다. 본 연구는 농촌관광을 하는 관광자들의 만족도 제고와 관광자원에 대한이해도를 높이기 위하여 실시되었으며 본 연구 결과를 통하여 도출된 농촌관광자원 유형 분류는 농촌관광자원 및 지역자원을소개하기 위한 홍보자료 및 웹, 앱 메뉴 설정 등에 이용되는 등 향후 활용성이 높을 것으로 기대한다.

The aim of this study is to analyze the green-tourism centrality considering spatial interaction using Gravity Model and social network method. The degree centrality and prestige centrality were applied as green-tourism centrality index. The rural amenity resources and human resources were counted as attraction factors, and a distance among villages was used as friction factor in gravity model. The weights of rural tourism amenity resources were calculated using the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) method and applied to evaluate green-tourism potentiality. The distance was measured with the shortest path among villages using geographic information system(GIS) network analysis. The spatial interaction from gravity model were employed as link weights between nodal points; a pair villages. Using the spatial interaction, the degree-centrality and prestige-centrality indices were calculated by social network analysis and demonstrated possibility of developing integrated green-tourism region centered on high centrality villages.

The objectives of this study are to develop a green tourism potential evaluation method with rural amenity and demand of citizen. The new index which was named GPD(green tourism potential degree) is designed to propose the green tourism potential of rural areas using spatial analysis of geographic information system and spatial interaction of gravity model. And in order to evaluate the green tourism potential with supply side and demand side, two indices were defined; One is green tourism demand degree(GDD) which is developed to quantify a demand side potential by the analysis of urban population and urbanization index, and the other is green tourism attraction degree(GAD) which is developed to quantify a supply side potential by the analysis of rural amenity values using AHP algorithm, based on opinion of related experts. The developed method was applied to a part of Kyounggi province, Seoul and Incheon. All the study area's GAD, GDD and GPD were assessed and the proposed green tourism potential evaluation method could be used in developing rural development plans and green tourism policies considering spatial interaction with citizen and green tourism resources.

The rural area has kept traditions and green open spaces highlighted in these days since the life quality elevated. Institute of Rural Resources Development has been conducting nation-wide survey project for rural amenity resources to construct the databases of rural amenity distribution and richness. Using surveyed data from the project, this study was implemented to evaluate rural amenity values based on SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) method considering two aspects including living and tourism amenity. For defining the set of evaluation criteria, the rural amenity resources were classified into almost intact nature resources(natural resources), interaction between nature and man resources(cultural resources) and man-made resources(social resources). The weighting values of the criteria were evaluated from the step wise pair-comparison results by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. In the results of weighting values related to living amenity, social resources was the hightest ranked criterion (0.512), followed by cultural resources (0.245) and natural resources (0.243). On the other hand, the results related to tourism amenity was that weighting values of natural resources, cultural resources and social resources were 0.481, 0.340 and 0.179, respectively. The two aspects evaluation methods was applied to the selected 18 areas (Myeon administration level) in Chungcheongbuk Do. The results demonstrated the differences of amenity values for living conditions and tourism conditions and could be used for prioritizing rural amenity planning.

This study aims to develop an evaluation method of green-tourism potential in village level with amenity resources of rural villages, considering human resources of the village. The amenity resources evaluation system was classified into three sub-classes with social, industrial, and natural resources. The system consisted of a relationship diagram between three classes resources and tourists' behavior. The new methodology considers human resources as a key factor for green-tourism potential evaluation of villages, including the amenity resources of three sub-classes. In quantitative method for the criteria, this study adopted a new method of continuous linear score method, which is applying fuzzy theory, not to give score with the existing discrete scoring method with several steps. The weighting values of the evaluation criteria were calculated from the step wise pair-comparision results by AHP(Analytic Hierachy Process) method, which industrial, natural, and social resources have relative weighting values of 523/1000, 319/1000, and 158/1000, respectively. In evaluation of another weighting value by the same methodology, the results showed that the amenity and the human resources have weighting values of 627/100 and 373/1000, respectively. The new evaluation method was applied to make the potential evaluation for rural villages of the study area, which located on Narial-myun, Keumsan-gun, Chungnam province. The development priority among the villages could be suggested reasonably by the new findings of this study, according to the evaluation results showing that the village with high possibility for development in green-tourism has high score in the potential evaluation.

This paper aimed at identifying rural amenities valuable in terms of marketed value and economic analysis of green tourism so as to develop policy instruments for new rural communities. We conducted the case study on Jik-Dong rural community in Taejeon city and estimated income effects of green tourism and internal rate of return of investment for rural amenity facilities. The research results are as followings; (1) green tourism participant will spend the worth of 50,392 won per person, (2) earnings from green tourism amounts to about 2,471 thousand won per household, (3) internal rate of return of green tourism investment is estimated as 7%. The strategies far green tourism is suggested as follows; (1) rural amenities should be well maintained for green tourism infrastructure (2) measures to internalize the value of rural amenities should be developed for market oriented peen tourism (3) effective program for inducing visitors with purchasing power should be designed.