본 연구는 농촌경관유형의 분류를 위한 새로운 분석의 틀을 설정하고 각 유형별 대표경관요소를 파악함으로써 농촌경관자원의 효율적 활용과 보존을 위한 기초자료를 제공하고자 실시하였다. 농촌경관유형 분석의 틀은 3개 대분류, 9개 중분류, 71개 경관요소로 세분류하였으며 이를 기준으로 5년 동안 농촌어메니티 100선에 선정된 500개의 농촌경관사진을 분석하였다. 대분류에서는 자연경관, 생활경관과 생산경관이 유사한 비율로 나타났으며 첫 해에 비하여 마지막 해에는 자연 경관이 감소하였고 생산경관은 약간 증가하였으며 생활경관은 상대적으로 대폭 증가하였다. 중분류에서는 자연경관은 수경관, 생산경관은 경작지경관, 생활경관은 역사문화경관이 대표적인 경관으로 인식되고 있다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 세분류에서 대표경관요소는 산림경관은 숲, 수경관은 하천, 지형경관은 기암괴석과 특이지형, 경작지경관은 논, 생산시설경관은 저수지, 주거경관 은 마을, 가로경관은 담장, 역사문화경관은 노거수였다. 조망거리를 분석하면 근경이 과반수 정도로 가장 많았고 중경, 원경 순이었으며 자연경관에서는 원경, 생산경관에서는 근경, 생활경관에서는 중경이 타 경관유형에 비해 비교적 높은 비중을 차지하였다. 계절별로는 여름이 가장 많았고 가을, 봄, 겨울 순으로 모든 경관유형에서 여름이 가장 높았다.

As rural landscape is considered important elements of rurality, there are many concerns about management and conservation. Rural development administration have performed rural amenity resources survey project in South Korea from 2005 for verifying states and efficient management of rural amenity. There are some problems about ambiguous definition of rural landscape range and data overlap. In this research, we reviewed rural amenity resources survey focusing rural landscape and analysized elements of 50 complex landscape resources in 2008 rural amenity selection 100. Finally, we suggested landscape viewpoint resource table in place of rural landscape because it can minimize data overlap in survey project.

Amenity landscapes in rural areas are becoming increasingly important as a resource to enhance the (public) interest in rural landscapes and to vitalize the rural areas. Befitting the times, the objective of this project is to discover the amenity landscapes distributed throughout the rural areas and to produce material in the form of a publication for the promotion of the aforementioned landscapes. For such purposes, local autonomous bodies, rural amenity resource investigation team, and experts on landscape found rural amenity landscapes and entered them for a selection process, out of which the top 100 rural amenity landscapes were ultimately selected based both on the assessment system developed by the researchers and on the assessment process executed by the assessment committee. The following two categories of assessment criteria for the amenity landscapes were presented: village-related assessment criteria including value as resource and use value; landscape-resources-related assessment criteria, including aesthetic value, identity, adherence to traditionality, and sustainability. Assessment for each criteria item was made by applying a 5-point Likert scale throughout. The sum of the points for each landscape was then converted at a 100 point scale for ultimate use in selection of the top 100 landscapes. This paper is the outcome of such series of processes and systems.

Rural landscape is essential resources to reinvigorate rural tourism and local economy. The objective of this study is to apply the methodology that can assess landscapes of many rural villages based on the data of Rural Amenity Resource Survey. Above all, to make the data of rural amenity resources survey appropriate for landscape assessment, that was reclassified into 4 landscape resource and 12 lower items. Secondly, 4 evaluation standards of rural landscape; weight of landscape resources, weight of lower items, evaluation of lower items as the number, and evaluation of management condition was established by questionnaire survey. Thirdly, the evaluation standards was applied to case study area; Jug-Goc Myeon, Goc-Seong county, Jeollanamdo. Finally, this result was compared with the other result that management condition was not included in, and the villages that were urgent to improve management condition were selected. As a result, water resource and management condition have great effects on the total quality of rural landscape. Therefore, there are many villages that have peat potentials although that indicates low quality of landscape, now.