본고는 「교육용기초한자 자소표 制定을 위한 試案 연구」(2015)에서 제시한 ‘試案’과 현재 중국 교육부에서 제정하여 시행하고 있는 「現代常用字部件及 部件名稱規範」(2009)과의 상호비교를 통하여, 兩者 간의 得失을 따져 보고, 그 결과에 근거하여 ‘試案’의 미비점을 보완하기 위하여 작성되었다. 이를 위하여, 우선 ‘試案’에서 제시한 310개 組 453개 기초자소와 중국의 441개 組 514개 部件을 서로 비교하여 일차적으로 아래와 같은 兩者 간의 차이를 가려내었다. 1. 양자가 동일하게 선정한 자소: 343개 2. 前者에서 따로 설정한 자소: 110개 3. 後者에서 따로 설정한 자소: 171개 본고는 위의 3과 4를 중심으로 하여 양자 간에 차이가 나는 원인을 분석한 결과, 그 원인은 아래와 같은 이유에서 비롯된 것임을 적출 할 수 있었다. 1. 楷書體와 簡體字 간의 乖離 2. 對象 字數의 차이 3. 문자의 系統性과 現實性에 대한 인식차이 4. 層次分析 방법의 채택여부 5. 기타 이상의 비교작업을 통하여 양자 간의 得失을 糾明해 본 결과, 양자 모두 각 각 설정한 ‘자소추출원칙’을 일관되게 지키지 못한 경우가 적지 않게 확인되 었고, 疏漏한 부분 역시 적지 않게 발견되었다. 그러나 작업을 통하여 전자 의 문제점을 다시 검토하고 보완 할 수 있는 방법을 모색할 수 있게 되었으 며, 자소 數의 增減 、分組(組 나눔) 등의 문제에 있어서는 구체적으로 修訂 해야 할 부분도 발견할 수 있었던 것은 큰 수확이라고 판단되었다. 이외에 도, 본고의 작업결과는 한자문화권에서의 한자공용문제를 해결하기 위한 기 초자료로 사용될 수 있을 것이며, 현재 韓中 양국에서 각각 公式字形으로 사용하고 있는 楷書體와 簡體字간의 互換原理를 파악하는데 있어서의 중요 한 학습자료로도 이용될 수 있을 것이다.

North Korean tale Ch’ŏngryongŭi poŭnn which was covered in this article is a representative folktale which was modified based on Juche Ideology. It is identical with Chinegaksi which is a representative folktale in the Korean penisula except for the ending part. The difference in the ending is whether the fortune given to the male protagonist is individual or collective in its nature. This difference seems to be due to modification with the influence of collective morality and Juche ideology of North Korea. To assess the literary value of the modified narrative, this article learned about the identity and value of this tale based on the pre-division era records. And by comparing how modern tales in South and North Korea from a similar period and status accept archetype of this tale, this article aimed to analyze the narrative value of this tale. North Korean tale Ch’ŏngryongŭi poŭnn will be regarded as an important material to understand the social culture of North Korea and an old story with the message of social integration in the future society of the unified Korean peninsula. This tale is a story about two different beings trusting each other and working toward a better future. In other words, it is a story about the value of “symbiosis” being realized in the dimension of “group.” Despite the modification intention behind this literature which is based on the North Korean view of history, this tale is an important literary work that shows what kind of life “we” as a group should pursue in a modern society filled with suspicion and fear.

This study tries to illustrate that oral history can open a new prospect in the field of a Korean church history, a modern history of Korea, and World history. Firstly, this paper deals with theoretical approach about oral history. A basic direction of oral history is to supplement establishing materials and to make people’s memories be historical. Furthermore, oral history aims at new historical fields through enlargement of interviewees and reflection on philosophy of history and historical theory. General historians overlook a religious inner side easily. However that is a mistake of ‘process-reduction.’ Oral history is an alternative overcoming that kind of mistake. Especially oral history of religion is a historical method to discover new histories by their own confess-language differed from the fact-language and the interpret-language. Secondly, this paper suggests that the oral history of religion probes many varieties of historical layer, focusing on the Christians who were participated in the Korean pro-democracy. Christian democratizers played a leading role under the military dictatorial government. Moreover, they consolidated not only people in many fields such as religion, press, student, judicial officer circles and so on nationally, but also compatriots overseas. Outside of those, this paper prefigures a possibility of enlargement of oral history by illustrating examples of various historical layers. Finally, the present writer finishes, giving discourse assignments to the readers. One is to reflect the way of sharing memory. If the survivors passed away, their experiences become extinct. In order to overcome that crisis, a oral history needs to be investigated, searched for the way of sharing memory. Another is to reflect on a position of a oral history between micro-history and macro-history. A oral history is located in the context of micro-history. Nevertheless, it is important to work a oral history having a mind to criticize individuality and generality in micro and macro dimension.

A major history textbook for high schools, A Modern History of Korea for High School (Seoul: Kumsung Publishing House, 2007) described that Protestantism in Korea supported Japanese invasion to Korea. The text book has been used for many years by more than 50% high schools in South Korea. The argument of this book is very important because it might influence over high school students who think that the text book should always be correct. However, Protestantism in Korea was not the supporter of the Japan Empire in the turn-of-twentieth century Asia. In reality, Korea Protestantism had been appeared by Korean people as defender of Korean people against Japanese power. At that time Korea protestantism had been closely related to America which send their missionaries to Korea and helped its modernization. When Japan tried to put Korea in her power, King KoJong sent his envoy to the president Roosevelt of USA for help to maintain his independence. In reality, Japan government had considered Korean Protestantism as big obstacle for its rule over Korea. Japan had always be afraid of Korean Christianity and spied over it. Japanese army in 1911 arrested 105 important Christian leaders to destroy Korean churches. Also, in the last years of Japan imperialism, Japan governor-general of Korea expelled American missionaries from Korean peninsular to disconnect Korean Christian relationship with America. Finally, missionaries tried to maintain the principle of separation between church and state in Korea. They did not involve in political matter either on Korean nationalism or Japanese imperialism. This attitude of missionaries could not be satisfied with Japanese as well as Korean. However, they thought that their original mission in Korea is evangelization, but not independent movement of Korea.