논문 상세보기

위치추적 전자장치 부착명령의 위헌성 유무 KCI 등재

A Study on Constitutionality of Attachment Order of Electronic Device for Tracking Location

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/273062
서비스가 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
刑事判例硏究 (형사판례연구)
한국형사판례연구회 (Korean Association of Criminal Case Studies)
초록

This study has considered on basis of constitutionality that the attachment order of electronic device for tracking location doesn't violate the principle of prohibition against double jeopardy, over-prohibition, and rights to equality. The attachment order of electronic device for tracking location doesn't violate the principle of prohibition against double jeopardy because it is a security measure to restrict freedom without imprisonment. However double assessment of second conviction dangerousness at additional punishment to repeated offense and sentence of the attachment order of electronic device for tracking location could be raised objection of double jeopardy. A sex offence has a character that second conviction dangerousness and crime victimization are serious. Thus to release sex offenders is very dangerous, and protection of victims and social defence are necessary. Therefore the attachment order of electronic device for tracking location doesn't violate the principle of over-prohibition because there is a balance between human rights violation and public interest. The attachment order of electronic device for tracking location is applied special offences, but it doesn't violate the principle of rights to equality because of a sanction to character of sex offenders.

목차
[대상판결] 대법원 2009. 5. 14. 선고 2009도1947, 2009전도5 판결
  사실관계
  판결요지
 〔연구〕
  I. 문제제기
  II. 일사부재리의 원칙 위반 여부
  III. 과잉금지 및 평등의 원칙 위반 여부
  IV. 결 론
  [참고문헌]
  [Abstract]
저자
  • 이춘화(한국청소년정책연구원 수석연구위원, 법학박사) | Lee, Choon Hwa