The study is conducted in order to identify whether there is difference in laboratory safety management committee and safety manager appointment for type of institutes(university, research institute, enterprise institute). The study conducted statistical analysis of 2484 institutes (university, research institute, enterprise institute) that attended 'current status of laboratory safety management' by year(number of current status participation).
As a result, university showed increase in forming safety management committee as the number of current status(year) increases. The number of safety management committee held were the highest amongst all institutes being 2 held/ 2 year. Furthermore, period of safety management committee held at university and research institutes are decreasing stately. For 2014, the rate of hosting periodic committee and temporary committee simultaneously when necessary are increasing. The rate of appointing safety manager who is in charge of laboratory safety is increasing in university, but it is decreasing in research institute and enterprise institute. The work pattern of safety manager in university is increase in exclusive duties and decrease in adjunct duties, while work pattern in research institute and enterprise institute is more on the contract duties.

1. 서 론
 2. 연구 대상 및 방법
  2.1 연구 기간 및 대상
  2.2 연구 방법
  2.3 분석 방법
 3. 결 과
  3.1 연도별 연구실 안전관리위원회 구성 및개최 차이
  3.2 연도별 연구실 안전관리자 선임
  3.3 기관 유형별 안전관리위원회 구성과 안전관리자 선임의 비교
 4. 결론 및 고찰
 6. References

• 권윤아(서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지안전공학과) | Yuna Kwon Corresponding Author
• 권영국(서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지안전공학과) | Young-Guk, Kwon