논문 상세보기

유기 조사료 급여 농가의 영양소 균형 및 유생산성 평가 KCI 등재

Evaluation of the Milk Productivity and Nutrient Balance of Forage Sources for Organic Dairy Farms in Korea

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/317246
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,000원
한국초지조사료학회지 (Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland Science)
한국초지조사료학회 (The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science)
초록

This study was conducted to evaluate the milk productivity and nutrient balance in organic dairy farms located at Gochang-gun of Korea with different feed sources. The total number of organic dairy farms was 12 in 2012, 13 in 2013, and 14 in 2014. The numbers of farms and dairy herds were increased each year. The average milk yields in 2012, 2013, and 2014 were 25.5, 24.6, and 24.4 kg/d, respectively. The average milk fat contents in 2012, 2013, and 2014 were 3.5%, 3.6%, and 3.7%, respectively. The average milk protein contents in 2012, 2013, and 2014 were 3.3%, 3.4%, and 3.4% in 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively. Although the average milk yield of organic dairy farms was 9 kg/cows/d less than the average milk yield of other dairy farms in Korea, milk fat and protein contents of organic dairy farms were higher than those of other dairy farms. Alfalfa hay, oat hay, corn silage, rye grass silage, Sudan grass silage, rice straw, and barley silage were commonly used as forage sources in organic dairy farms. The average silage intake (15.6 kg/cow/d) of organic dairy farms in 2013 was higher (P < 0.05), while the average hay intake (5.1 kg/cow/d) in 2014 was higher (P < 0.05) than that of other feed intake. Net energy for lactation (NEL) and metabolizable protein (MP) were calculated in accordance with NRC (2001). Net energy for lactation intake was higher (P < 0.05) while MP intake was lower (P < 0.05) than NRC recommendation values in 2013 and 2014. These results indicate that domestic organic dairy farms should use feed considering energy and protein balance recommended by NRC.

목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
 Ⅱ. 재료 및 방법
  1. 조사 대상농가 및 방법
  2. 사료 성분 분석
  3. 영양소 공급 수준 및 유생산성 평가
  4. 통계분석
 Ⅲ. 결과 및 고찰
  1. 우군 분포 및 사양관리 실태 조사
  2. 연도별 유량 및 유성분 변화
  3. 영양소 균형 및 생산성 평가
 Ⅳ. 요 약
 Ⅴ. 사 사
 Ⅵ. REFERENCES
저자
  • 나영준(건국대학교 동물자원과학과) | Y J Na
  • 신기문(건국대학교 동물자원과학과) | K M Shin
  • 임종수(건국대학교 동물자원과학과) | J S Rim
  • 방제용(서울여자대학교 환경생명공학부) | J W Bang
  • 이상락(건국대학교 동물자원과학과) | S R Lee Corresponding author