논문 상세보기
pp.65-81
본 연구의 목적은 태권도 지도 효능감의 개념 구조를 확인하고 서구에서 개발된 스포츠 코칭 효능감(Feltz 등, 1999)과 한국형 코칭 효능감(박정근, 1996)의 차이를 규명하는데 있다. 전국 소재 태권도 도장 지도자 90명을 대상으로 한 개방형 설문지 반응을 귀납적 내용분석 하였으며, 여기에서 얻어진 130개 문항을 2차 수정과정을 거쳐, 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석을 실시하여 구조 타당성을 검증하였다. 요인탐색에서 5개 요인에 21개 문항이 탐색되었고, 최종적으로 확인적 요인분석에서 기술지도, 동기유발, 지도자 수양, 지도자 상담으로 네 개 요인에 총 19개 문항을 확정했으며, 확인적 요인분석의 적합도 지수 값들이 대체적으로 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 결과적으로, 본 연구를 통해 한국 태권도 지도 효능감의 개념은 기술지도, 동기유발, 지도자 수양, 지도자 상담 요인 등 네 개의 일반영역으로 구성되며, 스포츠 코칭 효능감의 개념구조와는 다른 것으로 나타났다.
The purpose of this research was to extract dimensions of the TaeKwonDo Coaching-Efficacy and to confirm the conceptual construction, which is based on TaeKwonDo Coaching-Efficacy. An open-questionnaire made through a pilot study was administered to 90 TaeKwonDo coaches, who were distributed in the whole country, to collect sources of TaeKwonDo Coaching-Efficacy, which were conducted by inductive analysis. There were collected 1,225 cases of the foundational basic data on the efficacy. However, 125 cases were selected by excepting overlapping data and collecting similar ones among those things in specialist groups. 125 cases of the sources were categorized in 23 detail domains. In the field of the detail territories, the Questionnaire of TaeKwonDo Coaching-Efficacy(QTKDCE) was created by two adjustments. According to adjustment, there were selected 74 questions through specialists` meeting. These researches were performed by two kinds of methods. The exploratory factor analyses were done in the first research. In the second one, the confirmatory factor analyses were used. The results were produced in two researches as follows. The first, TaeKwonDo Coaching-efficacy were confirmed as teaching techniques(5 scales), arousing motivation(5 scales), master`s cultivation(5 scales), master`s consultation(4 scales) with four factors and nineteen scales totally. The second, the result of confirmatory factor analyses, most index values were appeared probably appropriate fit. According to this study the conception of TaeKwonDo Coaching-Efficacy was confirmed that it was different with Feltz(1999)`s and Park(1996)`s conceptual construction.
