This study was conducted to establish scores according to the importance levels of each HACCP evaluation item in cattle farm. The importance levels and score of each HACCP evaluation item was derived through the non-compliance rate and severity levels of hazard. In order to change the score criteria according to the importance of each HACCP evaluation item, we analyzed the importance of each HACCP evaluation item by using the portfolio mapping method according to the occurrence frequency and severity levels of hazard. The scores were classified into 3 point, 2 point, and 1 point, respectively, by classifying the importance of each category as ‘high’, ‘middle’ and ‘lower’. Accordingly, we have established a now scoring system of each HACCP evaluation item through this study. Through the result of this study, the objectivity of the comparative evaluation was verified by implementing the currently used HACCP evaluation item to the cattle farm. In conclusion, Implementation of the result of this study to cattle farm may help to increase the objectivity and also improve more safety and hygienic cattle management and raw milk production.

Ⅰ. 서 론
 Ⅱ. 재료 및 방법
  1. 지적비율 분석을 통한 평가항목 배점기준 개선 방향
  2. 현행 평가항목 배점기준과 비교분석
 Ⅲ. 연구결과
  1. 소 농장 HACCP 심사결과 지적사항 발생빈도 분석
  2. 소 농장 HACCP 평가항목별 위해의 심각도 수준 분석
  3. 소 농장 HACCP 평가항목별 중요도 수준 분석
  4. 기존 소 농장 HACCP 평가항목 점수체계와 비교분석 및 농장 적용 결과
 Ⅳ. 고 찰
 Ⅴ. 적 요
 References

• 백승희(한국식품안전관리인증원) | Baek Seung-Hee
• 남인식(한경대학교 동물생명환경과학과) | Nam In-Sik Corresponding author