Because of not accepted on escape using elevators in fire emergency has some background. In the background elevator hoistway has turn into smoke spread route in fire. The escape that used an elevator was not able to make ends meet; of the big confusion is expected that cannot control the escape adequately, and do that elevator facilities breakdown possibility by the fire water, the escaper shut in car. Therefore ban on elevator service in fire time as a general rule. Recently, a few company promote super high-rise architecture in the country, a fire disaster prevention and human life safety measures preparation for PBD(A Performance Based Fire Protection Design) are studied concretely. And there is the escape example in fire time that used an elevator in the foreign country. You must promote it so that the escape measures that used enclosed stairway and an elevator in charge of a function of the mutual supplement. The result of this research can be used for establishing the standard and regulation for using elevators in fire emergency.

Abstract
 1. 서론
 2. 우리나라 건축법규에서의 승강기 설치대상 기준
 3. 건축용도별 승강기 설치현황
 4. 승강기를 이용한 피난 사례
  4.1 미국 LA의 퍼스트 인터스테이트은행 건물 화재[4][5][9]
  4.2 일본 오오사카시 아파트건물 화재[7][9]
  4.3 일본 히로시마시 고층아파트 화재[7][8]
  4.4 미국 세계무역센터 비행기충돌 테러사고[9][10]
 5. 피난에 이용하는 승강기의 안전성에 관한 문제점[13]
 6. 승강기 출입문의 차열ㆍ차염성능
  6.1 한국의 승강기 출입문 방화성능 기준
  6.2 일본의 승강기 승강로 방화구획 성능기준[19]
 7. 피난시 승강기를 이용한 피난의 조건과 과제
  7.1 피난자의 안전확보를 위한 피난관리
  7.2 승강기를 이용한 피난계획의 평가와 검증
  7.3 피난자 수송능력의 확보
  7.4 승강기 안전확보
 8. 결론
 9. 참고문헌

• 정의수 | Eui Soo, Chung