When 3D printing is used practically at construction sites, there is a serious lack of studies on the conflict with construction-related laws and expected operational problems. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to present obstacles and directions for improvement in construction-related laws (Building Act, Construction Technology Promotion Act, Housing Act, Construction Machinery Management Act, etc.) for practical operation of 3D printing. The important results are as follows. Amending existing construction-related laws for 3D printing is irrational and inefficient in terms of structure and material. This study proposed a method of satisfying performance required by laws or standards based on the performance design method presented in existing laws and systems through structure and material performance certification procedure. In addition, inclusion of 3D printing equipment in the Construction Machinery Management Act results in various restrictions such as equipment inspection and certification of machine parts. As such restrictions can block vitalization of 3D printing, a long-term and step-wise approach was suggested.

Abstract
1. 서론
    1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적
    1.2 연구의 범위 및 방법
2. 해외 3D 프린팅 정책 동향
    2.1 프랑스
    2.2 홍콩
    2.3 종합 분석
3. 3D 프린팅 실무 적용 시 장애 요인도출을 위한 전문가 설문조사
    3.1 설문조사 개요
    3.2 설문조사 주요 결과
4. 건설 관련법 제도적 장애 요인 파악
    4.1 개요
    4.2 건축법
    4.3 건설기술진흥법
    4.4 주택법
    4.5 건설기계관리법
    4.6 3D 프린팅 적용 시 장애 요인 종합 분석
5. 3D 프린팅 실무 적용을 위한 건설관련법 개선 방향
    5.1 개요
    5.2 3D 프린팅 실무 적용을 위한 건설 관련법개선 방향 제시
6. 결론
References

• 이성민(한국건설품질연구원) | Lee Sung-Min (Korea Construction Quality Research Center)
• 박상훈(한국건설품질연구원) | Park Sang-Hoon (Korea Construction Quality Research Center) 교신저자