Local Residents’ Quantitative Evaluation on Performance of Official Development Assistance in Agriculture and Rural Development
1. 본 연구의 목적은 한국 공여기관이 수행한 ODA 사업을 대상으로 수원국 주민에 의한 정량적 평가방법이 사후평가에 적용가능한지를 탐구함. 2. PLS-SEM 모형을 통해 OECD/DAC 5대 기준별 점수를 산출하였으며 추가로 ODA 성과가 주민 만족도와 공여국 이미지에 미치는 영향관계를 분석함. 3. 주민은 OECD/DAC 5대 기준 중 영향력에 대해 가장 낮은 점수를 부여하였으며 ODA 성과가 높을수록 주민 만족도와 공여국 이미지는 높아지는 것으로 나타남. 4. 본 연구를 통해 ODA 사업 사후평가에 주민참여형 정량적 평가의 적용가능성을 확인하였으며 본 평가방법은 공여국 전문가 주도의 평가방식을 보완하는 목적으로 그 유용성이 클 것으로 기대함.
The purpose of this study is to test the applicability of the resident-participatory quantitative evaluation on the Official Development Assistance (ODA) based on the criteria of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's Development Assistance Committee (OECD/DAC). The questionnaire was composed of 20 items related to relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, substantiality, resident satisfaction and donor country image with 5-point Likert scale. Data were collected from 200 residents in regions where the ODA project was conducted by a donor agency in Korea from August 20 to September 30, 2019. Partial Least Square-Structure Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to examine the significant effects of the performance of ODA project on residents’ satisfaction and donor country image. The result of the PLS-SEM analysis revealed that the performance of the ODA project was significantly associated with residents’ satisfaction and donor country image. The study verified the applicability of the resident-participatory quantitative evaluation using the 5 criteria of OECD/DAC and would contribute to complement the donor country expert-led evaluation in the field of agriculture and rural development.