논문 상세보기

3개의 서로 다른 엉덩관절 벌림 각도에 따른 교각 운동 중 큰볼기근, 뒤넙다리근, 뭇갈래근의 근활성도 비교 KCI 등재

Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Hamstring and Multifidus Muscle Activities During Bridge Exercises According to Three Different Hip Abduction Angles

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/412542
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,000원
한국전문물리치료학회지 (Physical Therapy Korea)
한국전문물리치료학회 (Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy)
초록

Background: Muscle activities of gluteus maximus (GM) and hamstring (HAM) have important roles in the stability and mobility of the hip joint during various functional activities including bridge and prone hip extension exercises.
Objects: The purpose of this study is to investigate muscle activities of GM, multifidus (MF) and HAM during three different bridge exercises in healthy individuals.
Methods: Twenty healthy subjects were participated. Electromyography device was used to measure muscle activities of GM, MF and HAM. Each subject was asked to perform three different bridge exercises with hip abduction (0°, 15°, 30°) in random order. One-way repeated measures analysis of the variance and a Bonferroni post hoc test were used. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.01.
Results: The muscle activity of GM was significantly different among three conditions (hip abduction 0°, 15°, 30°) (adjusted p-value [Padj] < 0.01). The muscle activity of GM was significantly greater during bridge exercise with hip abduction 30° compared to 0° and 15° (Padj < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the muscle activity of MF and HAM muscle (Padj > 0.01). The ratio of muscle activity (ratio = GM/HAM) during bridge exercise with hip abduction 30° was significant greater compared to the hip abduction angles 0° and 15° (Padj < 0.01).
Conclusion: Bridge exercise with hip abduction 30° can be recommended to selectively facilitate the muscle activity of GM and improve the ratio of muscle activity between GM and HAM.

목차
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
    1. 연구대상
    2. 측정방법 및 도구
    3. 실험 절차
    4. 자료 분석
RESULTS
    1. 근활성도
    2. 근활성도 비율
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
저자
  • 최지석(호서대학교 생명보건대학 물리치료학과,호서대학교 스마트 헬스케어 융복합 연구센터) | Ji-Seok Choi (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Life and Health Science, Hoseo University, Smart Healthcare Convergence Research Center, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea)
  • 장태진(호서대학교 생명보건대학 물리치료학과, 호서대학교 스마트 헬스케어 융복합 연구센터) | Tae-Jin Jang (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Life and Health Science, Hoseo University, Smart Healthcare Convergence Research Center, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea)
  • 전인철(호서대학교 생명보건대학 물리치료학과, 호서대학교 스마트 헬스케어 융복합 연구센터) | In-Cheol Jeon (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Life and Health Science, Hoseo University, Smart Healthcare Convergence Research Center, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea) Corresponding author