본 연구는 조직구성원들의 긍정심리자본 개발 및 조직의 리더육성을 위한 긍정리더십 역량 측정도구를 개발하고 타당화하는데 있다. 이를 위해 선행연구에서 제시된 긍정리더십 역량모형을 바탕으로 후속 연 구를 진행하여 타당성이 확보된 측정도구를 개발하였다. 연구 절차는 DeVellis의 척도 개발 절차를 적용 하여 예비문항 개발 및 검증, 측정도구 검증 단계를 거쳐 타당성을 확보하였다. 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 선행연구에서 제시된 3대 영역, 9개의 긍정리더십역량 구성요인의 측정도구로 사용할 예비문항을 개발하여 검증한 결과 41개 문항으로 구성되었다. 둘째, 측정도구 타당성 확보를 위해 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과 요인적재량 기준에 미치지 못한 문항이 삭제되었고, 유사한 개념끼리 통합되어 3대 영역, 7개의 긍정리더십 역량 요인, 24개 측정 문항으로 구성 되었다. 이후 공인타당성, 측정동일성 검증, 동일방법편의 검증의 과정을 거쳐 최종 확정된 긍정 리더십역량 측정도구는 개인영역은 자기인식, 긍정적 자기관리, 솔선수범 등 9문항, 관계영역은 구성원 존중, 구 성원 이해 등 8문항, 조직영역은 구성원 개발, 구성원 성과관리 등 7문항으로 총 24개 문항으로 구성되었다. 본 연구는 최근 변화되는 경영환경속에서 긍정리더십 역량 측정도구를 타당화하였다는 점에서 학문적 의의가 있으며, HRD 현장에 긍정리더십 역량을 측정하고 그 결과를 바탕으로 인적자원관리에 활용될 수 있다는 점에서 실천적 의의가 있다.
The purpose of this study is to develop and validate positive leadership Competency measurement tools for positive psychological capital development of organizational members and development of organizational leaders. For this reason, we conducted subsequent research based on the positive leadership Competency model presented in the previous research, and developed a measurement tool with guaranteed validity. The research procedure applied the DeVellis scale development procedure, and the validity was ensured through the development and verification of preliminary questions and the verification stage of measurement tools. The main research results are as follows. First, as a result of developing and verifying preliminary questions to be used as a measurement tool for nine positive leadership Competency components in the three major areas presented in the previous research, it consisted of 41 questions. Second, as a result of conducting exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to ensure the validity of the measurement tool, problems that did not meet the factor loading criteria were removed, similar concepts were integrated, and the three major areas, It consisted of 7 positive leadership Competency factors and 24 measurement questions. After that, the affirmative leadership competence measurement tool, which was finally confirmed through the process of official validity, measurement identity verification, and verification of the common method bias, has 9 questions such as self-awareness, positive self-management, and initiative criminal in the personal area, and related areas. Was composed of 8 questions such as respect for members and understanding of members, and the organizational area consisted of 7 questions such as member development and member performance management, for a total of 24 questions. This research has academic significance in that it has validated a positive leadership competence measurement tool in the recently changing business environment, measures positive leadership competence in the HRD field, and utilizes human resources based on the results. In particular, it has practical significance in that it can support.