논문 상세보기

신라 분황사탑의 ‘模塼石塔說’에 대한 문제 제기와 고찰 KCI 등재

Inquiry about ‘The Theory of Brick-Copy’ of the Stone Pagoda at Bunhuangsa Temple

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/424709
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,900원
건축역사연구 (Journal of Architectural History)
한국건축역사학회 (Korean Association of Architectural History)
초록

The Bunhuangsa stone pagoda, constructed in AD. 634, National Treasure no. 30, has been named as 'brick-copied pagoda' since the Japanese-ruling period by scholars. It is said that the Chinese brick pagoda was its precedent model, however the Bunhuangsa Pagoda is the oldest of all the Chinese-style brick pagodas except one, the Sungaksa Pagoda. The Chinese pagoda cannot have been a precedent model to copy due to its complex detail of wood vestige, as the Bunhuangsa pagoda is simple form without ornament. Domestic brick pagodas cannot have been a precedent model to copy as well, because all the domestic brick pagodas are younger than the Bunhuangsa Pagoda. Therefore, the terminology 'brick-copied pagoda' is a fallacy; it is rather that later brick pagoda copied the precedent the Bunhuangsa stone pagoda. The Bunhuangsa Pagoda is simply a piled-up pagoda of thick or thin, big or small slates of stone, facing only one smooth side and therefore needing nothing to relate to brick. The originality of the pagoda is more related to simple piled-up Indian stone stupa rather than Chinese brick pagoda. The roof form of its gradually stepped projection comes from the harmika of the summit of Indian stupa. Contrary to general history, old Silla Dynasty imported Buddhism directly from India by sea. From written national history and by temple foundation history, the Indian Buddhism evangelist possibly made influence to the erecting of temple and pagoda. The original wrong terminology has made a harmful effect gradually to the naming of mass-styled stone pagoda of only carved stepped-roof form after brick-copied pagoda. The false term 'brick-copied pagoda' should be discarded, which comes with superficial observation based on toadyism to China and colonialism to Japan. Instead of the fallacious term, this paper suggests multi-storied ‘piled-up pagoda with slate stone.'

목차
1. 서론
2. 기존 모전석탑설의 검토
    2-1. 모전석탑 용어의 기원
    2-2. 중국 전탑 모방설 검토
    2-3. 국내 전탑 모방설 검토
3. 분황사 석탑 발생원인 추정
    3-1. 벽돌과 돌의 생산 시공 용이성 비교
    3-2. 積石塔원조 인도 스투파
    3-3. 인도와의 직접 교류 가능성
4. 모전탑 오류 호칭의 확대재생산
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
저자
  • 이희봉(중앙대 건축학부 교수) | Lee Hee-Bong (Professor, Faculty of Architecture, Chung-Ang University) Corresponding author