논문 상세보기

다포계 공포의 살미 변천에 관한 연구 - 내외 2출목․내외 3출목 공포를 중심으로 - KCI 등재

A Study on the Transition of Salmi in Dapo Type Kong-Po(拱包) - Focused on Inner and Outer Same Chulmok(出目) -

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/424858
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,300원
건축역사연구 (Journal of Architectural History)
한국건축역사학회 (Korean Association of Architectural History)
초록

Integrated-Salmi can be suggested as a character of Da-po type Kong-po in Korea’s traditional architecture. However, only few studies are made on this subject yet. This study is to investigate the integration process of Salmi through cases of certain Kong-po which have the same number of inner and outer Chul-mok and are also known to precede in time. The results of the study are like below. First, Integrated-Salmi is more dominant in inner and outer 3 Chul-mok Kong-po than in inner and outer 2 Chul-mok Kong-po. Second, While inner and outer 2 Chul-mok prevail in Yeong-nam region, inner and outer 3 Chul-mok prevail in Ho-nam region. Third, integrated Salmi of Inner and outer 3 Chul-mok, first appeared in internal Jusangpo to be carried over to internal Juganpo then eventually to outer Salmi. Fourth, the reason why integrated form precede in internal salmi of inner and outer 3 Chul-mok Kong-po is due to 2 main factors. First of which is the impact of integrated Boaji that developed in Da-po type since the early 16th century. The second factor is downward expansion of Cho-gak’s Boaji which was adopted to cope with disorders made in structure of Chum-Cha, due to inner and outer 3 Chul-mok type buddhist temples’ wide reconstruction throughout Jeolla region following the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592. This study is to disclose the regularity of development process of Salmi’s Cho-gak(草 刻) which is a characteristic of Korea’s Da-po type Kong-po.

목차
Abstract
1. 서론
    1-1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
    1-2. 선행연구 및 연구 방법
2. 내외2출목․내외3출목 공포의 살미
    2-1. 용어 정의
    2-2. 내외 2출목 공포의 살미구성
    2-3. 내외 3출목 공포의 살미구성
3. 살미의 특징과 지역성
    3-1. 살미의 특징
    3-2. 살미에 보이는 지역성
4. 내부살미의 변천과정
5. 결론
References
저자
  • 이병춘(부산대학교 건축학과 박사과정) | Lee Byung-Chun Corresponding author
  • 이호열(부산대학교 건축학과 교수) | Lee Ho-Yeol