논문 상세보기
pp.23-32
This study systematically analyzed the causes of recurring electric shock accidents using accident analysis techniques and attempted to suggest implications for accident prevention. 124 electrocution death accidents that occurred from 2017 to 2022 were analyzed and classified into four factors(organizational influence, unsafe supervision, preconditions for unsafe acts, and unsafe acts) using the HFACS technique. As a result, First, in terms of organizational influence, many issues related to organizational processes were found, and the main causes were the lack of a safety management manual for electrical work, the lack of risk assessment, and the lack of safety procedures for electrical work. Second, in terms of unsafe supervision, the main causes were inappropriate operations such as not assigning a work supervisor during work or the lack of actual management and supervision. Third, in terms of preconditions for unsafe acts, the main causes were physical and technical problems such as not performing power outage work or not taking protective measures for live parts. Fourth, in terms of unsafe acts, the main causes were analyzed to be violations of safety procedures such as workers mistaking a power outage or not recognizing a current leakage condition, making a wrong judgment of the situation, and shortening the work time and working without safety measures for work convenience. Additionally, when examining whether the personal characteristics of those who died from electric shock had significant differences in unsafe behaviors, it was confirmed that there were significant differences in violations or decision-making errors depending on the industry and electrical-related major.
1. 서 론
2. 연구 방법
3. HFACS의 구성요소
3.1 조직 영향
3.2 불안전한 감독
3.3 불안전한 행동의 전제조건
3.4 불안전한 행동
4. HFACS 활용과정 및 감전사고 분석결과
4.1 사고 데이터 수집
4.2 분석·분류 및 근본원인 파악
5. 개인특성이 불안전한 행동에 미치는 차이분석
5.1 개인특성별 빈도분석
5.2 개인특성별 불안전한 행동의 차이분석
6. 결 론
6.1 내용 요약 및 시사점
6.2 연구 한계점 및 향후 과제
7. References
저자 소개
