Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the reviewers’ evaluations of papers submitted to the Journal of the Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing between 2019 and June 2024. Methods: We analyzed 117 quantitative (69 published and 48 unpublished) and 16 qualitative (11 published and five unpublished) studies. The reviewers’ checklist-based evaluations were analyzed using means and standard deviations. The scope method was used to examine the reviewers’ subjective evaluations. Results: For quantitative studies, the highest average score among published papers was in the “Research Theme” category (3.64±0.73). Contrastingly, the lowest average scores were in the “Discussion” category, with 3.32±0.74 for quantitative studies and 3.23±0.74 for qualitative studies. In rejected papers, the “Discussion” category recorded the lowest scores, at 2.35±0.74 for quantitative studies and 1.92±0.76 for qualitative studies. Conclusion: The results demonstrated the research characteristics of this journal and focus of the review by providing information on the reviewers’ evaluations. Structured scientific research based on these results will contribute to improving the academic quality of journals by reinforcing the openness and systematicity of academic communication.

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서 론
    1. 연구의 필요성
    2. 연구 목적
Ⅱ. 연구방법
    1. 연구 설계
    2. 연구 출처 및 연도
    3. 자료 분석
Ⅲ. 연구 결과
    1. 한국간호시뮬레이션학회지 심사결과의 양적자료 평가
    2. 한국간호시뮬레이션학회지 심사결과의 질적자료 평가
Ⅳ. 논 의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

• 허나래(한세대학교 간호학과 조교수) | Heo Narae (Assistant professor, Department of Nursing, Hansei University)
• 김지영(인하대학교 간호대학 부교수) | Kim Jiyoung (Associate professor, School of Nursing, Inha University) Corresponding author