This study compared relative growth rates (RGRs) of Neopyropia yezoensis and Neopyropia dentata in response to changes in water temperature (20, 22, 24, 26 and 28°C) and light intensity (40 and 80 μmol m-2·s-1) during early growth stages (1 and 10 mm). After 2 weeks of cultivation under a combination of high temperature and light intensity, the limit growth condition was 22°C for N. yezoensis and 26°C for N. dentata. N. yezoensis with 1 mm blade crimpled seriously at 22 to 26°C than its 10 mm blade. Both sizes were completely dead at temperature over 26°C. On the other hand, N. dentata was able to grow at relatively high temperatures. It grew higher with 10 mm blade than with 1 mm blade. N. dentata showed a normal color and displayed a flat surface without any decay at 28°C. The growth of N. dentata was limited and crimpled at 26 and 28°C 40 μmol photons m-2·s-1 conditions, although its normal growth and morphology were observed under other conditions. In the case of light intensity, it was confirmed that 80 μmol photons m-2·s-1 was more appropriate for grow of both species than 40 μmol m-2·s-1.

At Pyropia farms, organic acid treatments have enhanced productivity and quality by removing pest algae (such as Ulva spp. and diatoms) and reducing the occurrence of diseases. Ulva spp. attaches to the Pyropia nets competing for inorganic nutrients & space and diminishing productivity. Additionally, the presence of attached contaminants (such as diatoms and middy particles) on the Pyropia nets negatively affects the quality of Pyropia. This study investigated the effects of removing Ulva linza and washing the Pyropia yezoensis nets using an activating treatment agent (organic acid and highly saline solution) with an air bubble device. The results of measuring the dead cell ratios after treatment under different conditions showed that the dead cell ratio of U. linza did not significantly increase when the air bubble device combined the activating treatment agent with the activating treatment agent alone. When washing the P. yezoensis nets, the air bubble device was about 19-37% more effective than the activating treatment agent alone. The findings of this study suggest that the air bubble device enhances the efficacy of the activating treatment agent, resulting in the effective cleaning of the Pyropia nets.