Radioactive waste disposal facility in Korea, radioactive waste packaged in 200 L drums is placed in a concrete disposal container and disposed of at an underground silo type (cave) disposal facility. At this time, the disposal container cover is seated on the top of the disposal container, and if the disposal container and the cover are not completely combined, the container cover is raised up from the top of the disposal container, so safety problems may occur when stacking the disposal container. Therefore, various methods exist to secure a margin for the pure height inside the disposal container. The disposal container cover only covers the upper surface of the container to shield radiation, and structural performance is not required. Therefore, the method of processing the cover, such as a method of making the cover of the disposal container thin, is the easiest method to apply. In this study, a method to reduce the thickness of the cover of a concrete disposal container was devised, and structural performance under usability conditions such as lifting and seating was analyzed. In addition, the disposal container cover has a reinforced concrete form in which dissimilar materials (concrete and steel) are combined, an integrated analysis was performed to secure the reliability of the analysis results for this, and the analysis results were described. It was found that the proposed disposal container cover structure can improve usability by reducing the stress concentration phenomenon.
The criticality analyses considering burnup credit were performed for a spent nuclear fuel (SNF) disposal cell consisting of bentonite buffer and two different types of PWR SNF disposal canister: the KBS-3 type canister and the small standardized transportation, aging and disposal (STAD) canister. The criticality analyses were carried out for four cases as follows: (1) the calculation of isotopic compositions within a SNF using a depletion assessment code and (2) the calculation of the effective multiplication factor (keff) value using a criticality assessment code. Firstly, the KBS-3 type canister containing four SNFs of the initial enrichment of 4.0wt% 235U and discharge burnup of 45,000 MWD/MTU was modelled. The keff values for the cooling times of 40, 50, and 60 years of SNFs were calculated to be 0.74407, 0.74102, and 0.73783, respectively. Secondly, the STAD canister was modelled. The SNFs contained in the STAD canister were assumed to be the enrichment of 4.0wt% and the burnup of 45,000 MWD/MTU. The keff values for the cooling times of 40, 50, and 60 years were estimated to be 0.71448, 0.70982, and 0.70743, respectively. Thirdly, the KBS-3 canister with four SNFs of which the enrichment was 4.5wt% and the burnup was 55,000 MWD/MTU was modelled. The keff values for the cooling times of 40, 50, and 60 years were 0.73366, 0.72880, and 0.72634, respectively. Finally, the calculations were carried out for the STAD canister containing four SNFs of the enrichment of 4.5wt% and the burnup of 55,000 MWD/MTU. The keff values for the cooling times of 40, 50, and 60 years were 0.70323, 0.69946, and 0.69719, respectively. Therefore, all of four cases met the performance target with respect to the keff values, 0.95. The STAD canister showed lower keff values than the KBS-3 canister. This appears to be the neutron absorber plate installed in the STAD canister although the distance among the four SNFs in the STAD canister was shorter than the KBS-3 canister.