복어는 동아시아 요리의 고급 원료로 상업적 가치가 높 은 수산자원이나, 야생 복어의 테트로도톡신은 치명적인 식중독 사건을 꾸준히 유발하고 있다. 자주복은 한국, 일 본, 중국에서 인기 있는 복어 종으로, 테트로도톡신이 없 는 복어 생산을 위해 양식되는 주된 어종이다. 따라서 양 식 자주복과 자연산 자주복의 구별은 식품 안전과 규제측면에서 매우 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 국내 온라인 및 오프라인 시장에서 판매되는 100개의 자주복 제품을 대상 으로 ‘양식 및 자연산’ 여부를 PCR 기반 방법을 이용하 여 확인하였으며, PCR 결과를 제품의 표시사항 정보와 비 교하였다. PCR 분석에는 자연산 자주복과 양식 자주복의 유전적 다양성 차이를 보이는 6개의 마커를 이용하였다. PCR 분석 결과 모든 양식 자주복 제품에서는 6개 마커에 서 모두 완전한 증폭 패턴을 보였으나, 자연산 자주복 제 품에서는 0 - 5개 마커에서 만 무작위 증폭 패턴을 나타냈 다. 따라서 6개 유전 마커의 증폭 패턴을 이용한 분석법 은 향후 자주복 제품의 허위표시 모니터링 및 테트로도톡 신 유무의 신속 검사에 널리 활용될 수 있을 것이다. 또 한 본 연구 결과는 현행 복어 종 판별을 보완할 수 있는 기초자료를 제공해 줄 수 있다.

As the acceptance criteria for low-intermediate-level radioactive waste cave disposal facilities of Korea Radioactive Waste Agency (KORAD) were revised, the requirements for characterization of whether radioactive waste contains hazardous substances have been strengthened. In addition, As the recent the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission Notice (Regulations on Delivery of Low- Medium-Level Radioactive Waste) scheduled to be revised, the management targets and standards for hazardous substances are scheduled to be specified and detailed. Accordingly, the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) needs to prepare management methods and procedures for hazardous substances. In particular, in order to characterize the chemical requirements (explosiveness, ignitability, flammability, corrosiveness, and toxicity) contained in radioactive waste, it must be proven through documents or data that each item does not contain hazardous substances, and quality assurance for the overall process must be provided. In order to identify the characteristics of radioactive waste that will continue to be generated in the future, KAERI needs to introduce a management system for hazardous substances in radioactive waste and establish a quality assurance system. Currently, KAERI is thoroughly managing chelates (EDTA, NTA, etc.), but the detailed management procedures for hazardous substances related to chemical requirements in radioactive waste in the radiation management area specified above are insufficient. The KAERI’s Laboratory Safety Information Network has a total periodic regulatory review system in place for the purchase, movement, and disposal of chemical substances for each facility. However, there is no documents or data to prove that the hazardous substances held in the facility are not included in the radioactive waste, and there are no procedures for managing hazardous substances. Therefore, it is necessary to establish procedures for the management of hazardous substances, and we plan to prepare management procedures for hazardous substances so that chemical substances can be managed according to the procedures at each facility during preliminary inspection before receiving radioactive waste. The procedure provides definitions of terms and types of management targets for each characteristic of the chemical requirements specified above (explosiveness, ignition, flammability, corrosiveness, and toxicity). In addition, procedure also contains treatment methods of radioactive waste generated by using hazardous substances and management methods of in/out, quantity, history of that substances, etc. As the law is revised in the future, management will be carried out according to the relevant procedures. In this study, we aim to present the hazardous substance management procedures being established to determine whether radioactive waste contains hazardous substances in accordance with the revised the notice and strengthened acceptance criteria. Through this, we hope to contribute to improving reliability so that radioactive waste could be disposed of thoroughly and safely.