本≪汉书≫同≪史记≫是中国史学史上代表性的著作，是继司马迁写到 汉武帝的≪史记≫而写的正史，也称为“第二个正史”。≪史记≫为通史，是 从皇帝开始到汉武帝太初年间（BC104~101）的记录，≪汉书≫为断代史， 是从汉高祖元年（BC206）到王莽地黄4年（AD23）间的记录。班固编纂汉 书不仅承袭了≪史记≫的体系，还通过承袭很多资料和修改等过程完成了伟 大的杰作。≪汉书≫由12帝纪、8表、10志、70列传，共100卷组成，其文献 性价值同史记一起，在中国文献学史上有非常重要的评价。为理解这样的≪ 汉书≫，需要了解多种语言现象，其中有关音，认为非常重要的现象就是通 假。 通假字是想要表达意思的字虽然存在，但是写字的人写的时候想不起 来，而借用意思不同但发音相同的字写出的字。古籍中有很多这种通假现 象，如果不知道通假现象，就会存在不能正确理解文章意思的情况。 此论文的主要目的为，分析≪汉书≫中存在的通假现象. 其中可以找出 一定的通假现象规律，可分为，第一，声母相同的字；第二，韵母相同的 字；第三，声母、韵母都相同的字；第四，声母和韵母都不同的字。尤其， 找出≪汉书、本纪≫中可以看见的通假字，并进行翻译，进而为了了解如何 通假，想对上古音进行比较。

Through a deep research of the Grammatical fetures and Syntax function of the Classical Chinese Pronoun—“Zi”, while it is in the time known as separatedly-used, this paper finds that the Classical “Zi” owns three functions known as Correlative, Emphasis and Analogy. Sincet he Antecedents of “Zi” is able to be discovered in its jurisdictional term regions, it proves that “Zi” accept local binding, which follows the First principle of Binding theory. Since the Classical “Zi” is more similar to the Correlatives in Western languages including the English language, it can be categorized as reflexive pronoun among all Correlatives. Where ever the position of “Zi” in the terms, it is just a regional reflexive pronoun, and can only find its Antecedents in its jurisdictional regions which bound to the Binding theory of Chomsky. Therefore, “Zi” is not the factor which explains the reason why “Ziji” is able to accept Long-distance binding.