종래 농촌개발전략은 농업 및 농민에게 중점을 두고 도시의 편리성을 지향하는 정책이었다. 그러나 농업에 의한 농촌발전의 한계성이 드러나고 도시를 지향하는 농촌의 정주정책은 농촌경관의 획일화를 초래함에 따라 농촌다움이 상실되는 문제점을야기하여 왔다. 이로인해, 농촌다움의 상실은 농촌 자체 매력의 상실을 가져왔으며, 이는 소비자인 도시민으로부터 외면당하는결과를 초래하였다. 이에 따라 농업과 농촌이 가지고 있는 잠재적인 기능과 다면적인 기능에 대한 재평가가 이루어지고있으며 이의 활용을 통한 농촌의 활성화를 모색하는 대안이 제기되고 있다.따라서, 본 연구의 목적은 농촌경관 자원으로서 그 중요성이 커지고 있으며, 활용가능한 자원으로 인식되고 있는 농업생산경관의심리적 특성을 분석함으로써 농촌계획에 있어 활용가능한 심리적 인자를 제시하고자 하며, 이후의 농촌계획 및 경관영향평가에 실질적으로 적용할 수 있는 평가기준을 마련하고자 한다.

With increasing public concern for environmentally friendly agriculture, ecological aspect of landscape management is of growing importance. AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) analysis were conducted based on the delphi survey of 31 experts to evaluate the relative importance and the preference of landscape elements. Landscape components of organic farmland were classified into 2 landscape fields, 5 landscape types, 14 landscape units, and 37 landscape elements. Overall relevance score for the proposed landscape components were about 5.5 on the seven point scale. While the relative importance weight of cropland landscape field was 0.71, the weight of intra-structure landscape field was 0.29. Among the cropland landscape, relatively higher weight was assigned to farming system (0.47) and margins (0.31), as compared with hydrological system (0.22). In the farming system, crop (0.40) and farm land (0.39) were the most important landscape units. In the margins, higher weight was given to Buffer zone (0.44) and Trees (0.42). Biological habitat (0.43) ranked the highest score in the hydrological system. Preferable landscape elements were glass house, companion plants, rice paddy field, diverse crop species, small pond, and small river, which are representing ecological advantage of organic farming systems. This result indicated that the landscape elements identified in the study would be suitable to evaluate ecological aspect of rural landscape in organic farmland.

Amenity landscapes in rural areas are becoming increasingly important as a resources to vitalize the rural areas. Befitting the times, The objectives of this study were 1) Extracting Landscape Evaluation photos: research preferences of 93 Photos taken from 15 site and analyze the possibility of Classification. select 12 photos for Image survey. 2)Adjectives select: Preliminary investigation into the 45 selected adjectives and adjectives by taking expert group of 21 adjectives were selected. Through reliability analysis, 19 adjective pairs were used to survey and factor analysis of images of landscape photographs. 3)Psychological characteristics of agricultural landscape survey and analysis: Psychological research on landscape photos and factor analysis, the agricultural production landscape to explain the 4 factors were extracted. And, each factor was discussed in relation to agricultural landscape.

Recently, it is demanded to study about agri-environmental indicators including rural landscape indicators. However, there are deficiency to establish the policy of int landscape. This is the base study for the policy decision or management for conservation of agricultural landscape or rural landscape. The objectives of this study were 1) to analyze the supporting elements in the foreign policies, 2) to analyze the agricultural landscape elements and visual values in the field and 3) to make the classification form about the agricultural landscape. And finally, this study suggests the management guides for the conservation of agricultural landscape according to the teleological measures. Through this results, it would be expected to develop the efficient policy of rural landscape such as the direct payment program for rural landscape conservation.