본 연구는 지금까지 추진되어 왔던 전통테마마을 사업의 추진성과를 분석하기 위해 인적 요소, 경제적 요소, 사회적 요소 등으로 구성된 평가지표를 개발하였다. 평가지표에 대한 객관성을 확보하기 위해 전 문가를 대상으로 AHP법을 이용하여 중요도 평가를 실시하였다. 평가지표의 중요도는 주민만족도 (150), 주민참여도 (145), 경제적효과 (123), 민박가구수 (101), 리더양성정도 (96), 사업이해도 (90) 순으로 나타났 다. 6개 마을에 적용한 결과, 해바리마을, 다랭이마을, 남사예담촌, 물레방아떡마을, 산첩렵마을 순으로 평가량이 산정되었다. 농촌마을 간의 균형적인 발전을 도모하기 위해 인적 측면, 경제적 측면, 사회적 측 면에서 개선방안을 제시하였다.

As government and local governments are working on the various project about rural experience tourism village in these days, many rural villages are planned and developed, and try to come up to visitor’s demand. Not only quantitative growth by village development but also importance of programs operated by the rural villages are emphasized, therefore it needs to compare and analyze the activity programs about rural experience tourism village in rural community building business by season, characteristics of villages, and overall. Moreover, it has to try to suggest a basic direction of improvement about rural community building business. The site of researches are 15 villages that include 5 green rural tourism villages, 5 rural traditional theme villages, and 5 unique villages that are recent project. The result of research is that similar projects are operated and hard to find characteristic of seasonal programs in existing management business. On the other hand, the programs of recent management business operates not only the former program but also big and activity program using the village’s resources and characteristic.

This study discusses developing ecological trails and route alignment in mountainous rural area. Through a process of ecological resources survey, ecological trails and route alignment has been established. Mainly, by focusing on ecological resources in rural areas, it was indifferent to their own ecological resource and charm to make it unique strengths. Based on survey the results, Natural ecology resources, there were the climate factor, surface, geological, terrain analysis. Furthermore, ecological resources were researched and analyzed the elements of it, distribution of resources, types, location, semantic analysis. The results are expressed on the map and recorded by taking pictures. Plant ecosystem, there were actual vegetation, land use, flora analysis. Wild animal ecosystem, it was checked and recorded on 1/1,000 map partition the emergence of wild birds, the number of species distributed by foraging guild, the emergence of amphibians, reptile, mammals and insect species. The site is chosen as rural theme village in 2007, base on their own rich ecological and landscape resources. Therefore, we carried out ecological trails and route alignment plan in accordance with analyzed the natural ecological resource and after setting up the basic goal, ecological trail has been composed and planting has done and direction.

The objective of this study is to suggest planning directions for rural landscape management and conservation. With wide literature review, the Rural Traditional Theme Village were selected as case study areas to search for the main elements according to various spatial types. The pictures taken from the site investigation were used for a questionnaire survey to understand and to find the value of rural landscape. Finally, we found out 25 items from 3 spatial type (rural life area, agriculture production area and natural environment area), and Analyzed the Preference of rural landscape elements.

The purpose of this study is to propose the principle of rural village planning process based on rural resources, differently space planning process(regional planning, village planning, urban planning etc). The importance of this planning process is resources planning, facility planning, program planning. So we planed rural villages - two rural traditional theme villages. The major findings of this planning were as follows; First, we have to consider economic value of rural resources. Second, resources were used differently, according to village conditions, though same it. It is important to apply value-added it. Third, in future we have to additional studies; environment planning factor, community participation, resources evaluation in this planning.