미술 작품의 가치에 대한 무수한 담론은 시대를 아우르며 형성되어왔다. 현대 미술계는 20 세기 이후로 급진적으로 변화하여 다양한 유통 체제가 발전하였고 시장은 미술품의 생산과 소비 뿐 아니라 작품의 본질에까지 영향을 미치는 현상을 초래했다. 이에 따라 미술작품의 상품화 경향이 심화되며 현대미술과 자본과의 관계에 대한 쟁점이 대두되었다. 본 연구는 현대미술계에서 미술품의 상업적 가치가 작품을 평가하는 기준이 되는 현상에 대하여 부정적 결론을 도출하기 이 전에 미술 작품의 가치 평가가 어떠한 이론 과정을 통해서 정의되어 왔는지, 작품의 본질적, 상업적, 사회적 가치를 살펴보고 관계적 가치에 대해 모색한다. 또한 예술제도론을 토대로 미술 작품의 가치를 결정하는 예술계의 체계를 탐구한다. 본 연구에서는 미술 시장의 흐름에 따라 변화된 가치 형성 체계의 주체를 후원자, 화상/비평가, 경매로 정의하고 현대 미술계에서 자본과 상호작용하며 시대에 맞게 진화해나가는 미술계를 고찰한다.

The trend of “Blockbuster Exhibitions” over the past decade has led to the unfortunate reality that museums, losing sight of their role as an Academic organization, are becoming increasingly influenced by the corporate world. In my dissertation entitled “The Commercialization of Blockbuster Exhibitions in Museums,” I explore the modern tendency toward Blockbuster exhibitions in art museums and the negative impact of those exhibitions on the art world. Museums of the modern day have expanded their territory from the traditional venue of public education to the hybrid cultural space. This mission, evident in the museum’s attempt to satisfy audiences with the offering of diverse activities, has changed the concept of the museum, giving priority to the desire for financial gain. From the viewpoint of this new museology, the museum considers Blockbuster exhibitions as the safest method to increase ticket sales. As a program that openly reveals the commercialism of the museum, I explore the Blockbuster show and its strategies as a means of exposing the influence of the corporate world on art. A key component to the Blockbuster exhibition is the “hype” that is created to attract an audience. This devotion to increased publicity distracts from what should be the goal of public education, as the primary focus leans towards the desire for a large number of visitors. Consequently, this unavoidably standardized exhibition is presented to the public in a manner that deprives the audience of a unique experience. With large crowds and increased ticket prices, it is difficult to form a genuine appreciation of the artwork. In addition to the profit gained by increased ticket prices and the commercial sales of “souvenirs” from the museum gift shop, Blockbuster shows are used as a means to attract the attention of corporate sponsors. As explained in my dissertation, the importance that the museum places on corporate sponsorship as a capital resource is evident, however the degree to which the museum allows itself to be influenced by the desire for capital gain poses a threat to its function as an academic organization. Circumstances in American museum history, in particular, have influenced the transition from academic resource to corporation within museology. In keeping with the nation’s tendency towards capitalism, art museums in the United States were initially established and developed by individual capitalists who applied principals of corporate operation to museum management. As a result, in modern days, We witness the influence of enterprise on museum programs. while corporate management may be able to guarantee immediate fiscal benefits, however, it is unable insure the future of the museum. In sum, my dissertation discusses the mechanism of the commercialized “Blockbuster Exhibition” and the impact that it has on the future of the museum as an industry. This research provides an opportunity to reconsider the role of the museum as an academic institution, particularly in regard to the need to decrease the capitalization of exhibitions and refocus their influence on the art world as an educational resource.