본 연구의 목적은 민주시민이자 세계시민으로서 갖추어야 할 자질과 현재와 미래 사회에서 요구되는 인성을 평가하는 성찰-실천기반 인성척 도를 개발하는 것이다. 첫째, 50개의 예비문항으로 탐색적 요인분석을 수행한 결과 총 8개 요인(자기이해, 공감, 공정, 협동, 인권, 미디어리터 러시, 환경, 그리고 타문화이해, 각 요인당 4개 문항)을 추출하였다. 둘 째, 급내상관계수를 이용하여 척도의 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 평가하였고, 그 결과 8개 요인 모두 높게 나타났다. 셋째, 32개 문항으로 확인적 요 인분석을 수행한 결과 성찰-실천기반 인성척도 모형은 전체 설명변량 중 65.67%를 설명하였고 모형 적합도 지수는 좋은 것으로 나타났다. 본 척 도의 신뢰도와 타당도 모두 높게 나타났다. 이들 결과는 성찰-실천기반 인성척도는 타당하고 신뢰할 만한 인성 측정 도구로 사용될 수 있다는 것을 나타낸다. 본 연구의 성찰-실천기반 인성척도를 교육 현장에 적용 하여 인성교육의 효과성과 그 효과의 지속성을 검증하는데 사용할 수 있 을 것이다.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between MMPI(Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) scale and safety and health related indices in the shipbuilding workmen. The MMPI scores of the 230 shipbuilding workmen applicants and their performance records regarding safety and health were analyzed through t-test and one-way ANOVA to obtain the following results; (1) applicants intended to show the positive characteristics of their personality, and this attitude reflected a decrease on T-scores of MMPI; (2) there were significant relationships between some MMPI subscales and safety & health related indices. These results can be used to provide baseline information for more effective accident prevention programs.

Purpose: This study aims to identify the conceptual structure of In-sung, which was formed in unique environments including a sports venue, and develop In-sung scale in athletes. Methods: An open-ended questionnaire was given to 384 team or individual event athletes who attend high school or have higher education, to explore the conceptual structure and make questionnaires based on the results obtained from the open questionnaires. To develop the questionnaire, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted with a total of 546 athletes who attend high school or have higher educations. Results: Results from the exploratory factor analysis revealed that Korean athletes` In-sung was classified under five factors in competitive situation (Evoke negative emotions in the opponent, Respect for opponent, Consideration for teammates, Trust in leaders/senior members, Referee judgment), and four factors in generic situation (Politeness/ Respect, Loyalty, Social norm, Responsibility). The confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the model fit was judged to be good and identified 33 items in 9 factors. The convergent validity of the all selected items was tested.