‘把’구문은 중국어에서 사용빈도가 높지만, 한국인 중국어 학습자들에게 있어 학습 이 쉽지 않은 구문이다. 주된 이유 중 하나는 진리조건적으로 동등한 의미를 가지는 SVO 구문 및 화제화 구문과 어떠한 차이점이 있는지 알기 어렵기 때문이다. 이에 본고는 ‘把’구문의 구문의미, 정보구조, 사용환경에 대해 분석하여 이 같은 문제점을 해결하고자 시도하였다. 개별 구문은 고유한 구문의미를 가진다. 진리조건적으로 동 등한 의미를 나타내는 복수의 통사구조가 존재할 때, 구문의미는 언어 사용자의 선 택에 큰 영향을 미치는 요소이다. 본고에서 규정한 ‘把’구문의 구문의미는 ‘원상태와 결과상태 간의 어긋남’이다. 대다수의 기존연구에서는 ‘把’구문의 정보구조를 화제-평 언 구조로 분석했다. 하지만 이러한 이분법적 분석법으로는 ‘把’구문의 NP2가 보이는 화제성, 문장 전체가 신정보인 문장, NP2가 비한정적 명사구인 ‘把’구문의 정보구조 를 설명하기 어렵다. 본고는 Vallduví의 삼항계층분절 이론을 적용하여 ‘把’구문의 전 형적 정보구조와 비전형적 정보구조를 분석하였다. ‘把’구문의 구문의미를 적용하여 화자가 어떠한 환경에서 ‘把’구문을 선택하는지 설명할 수 있다. ‘把’구문은 ‘원상태와 결과상태 간의 어긋남’이라는 구문의미를 가진다. 그리고 이 구문의미는 상대방과의 관계에 따라 ‘질책’, ‘이의제기’, ‘미안함’, ‘자책’, ‘의외’, ‘여의치 않음’, ‘당위’ 등의 의미 를 나타낸다. 화자가 ‘把’구문을 선택하는 것은 이러한 주관성의 전달과 관련이 있다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the eco-friendly design characteristics of contemporary children’s collections. Photos from FirstviewKorea were utilized for analysis; 29 brands were selected that included children’s clothing collections featuring eco-friendly characteristics from 2007 to 2018. The results are as follows. First, naturalness was the most frequent characteristic of environmentally friendly children’s collections. It was not conveyed in an eccentric way in any season, showed a relatively uniform distribution, and was seen in various ways, including printed on the fabric and expressed in appliqués and embroidery. Second, handcrafted features frequently changed according to seasonal trends. Various methods such as beading, embroidery, applique, sewing techniques, and handbags were used, which enhanced manual workability, discrimination from other designs. Third, traditionality is divided into the characteristics of ethnicity and revivalism. National traditions were expressed in the clothing and reflected the current generation while connecting to the past. Fourth, simplicity appeared in classic designs such as simple silhouettes, sparse decoration, natural colors, and comfortable dress length that is not tight on the body. Simplicity was not a frequent feature due to the characteristics of the children’s clothing collections. Fifth, playfulness functioned to enhance the children’s clothing’s wear frequency. Although it was the least frequent of all the characteristics, it seemed to increase the design fun and the clothing’s value by fusing with other characteristics such as handcraftedness and naturalness.

Unlike the interpretations of some scholars, John Wesley did not have a fundamentalist world view, in which faith ignores or isolates scientific truth, as most revivalists are thought to have. Wesley tried to learn, understand, and use newly introduced scientific knowledge, information, and development. He was so eager to inform his followers of scientific truth as to write his own Compendium of Natural Philosophy, and revised and published it several times. Wesley was more familiar with the term natural philosophy rather than natural science, and he thought he was doing philosophy as universal knowledge. It is, however, hard to say that Wesley was simply an advocate of scientism. Wesley accepted scientific realities in the world, and he thought that the task of science is to describe the measurable and experimental facts and their processes and history. Wesley expected that the original intents and goals of the facts would be answerable by theology. In this sense, Wesley pointed out that the spot to answer all questions beyond science is the starting point of theology. In his thought, science and theology are well balanced, harmonized, and helpful for each other. Firstly, Wesley argued that science is the ground of theology, and the basis of theology. He believed that knowledge of the natural world leads people to faith in and study of God, the Creator and the Provider. On the basis of science, Wesley expected to begin the theology of creation and providence. He did not try to explain the nooks and crannies of facts with the verses from the Bible, because he thought that the mystery and awe is also part of science. He had such an optimistic view of science that he published a book of medical treatments for his preachers. Secondly, for Wesley science could be a ground in his eschatology. Especially, that the old Wesley was interested in natural science shows his expectation for the future, the new heaven and earth, and preparation for his own death. All the things which are mysteries and puzzle us now, believed Wesley, will be explained, understood, and solved in the end. Finally, Wesley’s science implied ethical requirements. As a minister, he tried to persuade his people to be “stewards” keeping the created world and restoring the corrupted parts with God’s grace. Wesley himself got involved in such issues as slavery, education, and female participation in ministry. In this sense, his theology as well as science showed somewhat radical and advanced aspects which some contemporary readers might be hesitant to follow.