이 연구는 대학에서 ‘음악의 이해’, 혹은 ‘서양음악의 이해’ 등의 명칭으로 개설된 교양과목으 로서의 ‘음악’에 관한 영화를 활용한 교수법을 다룬 것이다. 이 연구에서 칭하는 ‘대학교양음악’이란 인류문화와 함께 성장해 온 음악의 저변에 대한 고찰을 다루는 ‘음악 입문과목’으로서, 서양음악에 관한 역사, 감상, 이론 등이 유기적으로 어우러져 포괄적이고 통합적인 접근으로 교양교육이 이루어 져야 함을 상징한다. 이에 본 연구는 ‘교양교육으로의 음악’이라는 거시 목표 아래, 그 첫 걸음을 ‘영화’의 활용에서 찾고 있다. ‘영화 속 클래식’이라는 학습동기의 제공은 자칫 고루할 수 있는 클래식 음악에 대한 집 중도를 잃지 않게 하면서 교수자가 원하는 학습목표로의 도달을 용이하게 한다. 바로 이러한 점이 학습자들에게 클래식 음악으로 자연스럽게 입문하는 계기를 제공해 줄 수 있는 것이며, 궁극의 목표 인 음악을 폭넓게 즐기는 방법, 즉, 교양으로서의 음악교육에 도움이 될 방법을 찾아가는 길인 것이 다. 그러므로, 본 연구에서는 영화 《캐논 인버스》를 대상으로, 영화구도와 삽입된 클래식들의 음 악 교육적 관점 분석에 근거한 실제 강의 모형을 구축하였다. 이러한 ‘대학교양음악’의 구상을 통한 학습목표의 성취가 일차적으로는 합리적인 ‘대학교양음악’을 이끌 것이며, 나아가 대학의 효과적인 교양교육으로 이어질 뿐 아니라, 장기적 안목에서 국가와 사회가 지향하는 교양교육으로서의 이상을 실현하게 되는 하나의 대안이 될 것이다.

Constructed wetlands have been increasingly used as a low-energy 'green' technique since the mid-1990s, in the treatment of wastewater, driven by rising cost of fossil fuels and increasing concern about climate change. They are man-made systems or engineered wetland that are designed, built, and operated to emulate function of natural wetlands for human desires and needs. Among various applications of these wetlands, one area that is of significant importance is the removal of nitrogenous pollutants, to protect water environment and enable effective reclamation and reuse of wastewater. This report provides a current state of constructed wetland technology, focusing on CANON(completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite) process that existing types of wetlands, the mechanisms and kinetics of nitrogen removal, wetland design to system performance.

T. S. Eliot is regarded as one of the greatest critics in the last century. As a critic he tends to have strict canonical standards. However, his attitude toward Tennyson seems rather favorable. Of Tennysonian canonical traits, Eliot thinks abundance, variety, and competence are the essence of Tennysonian excellence as a poet. He further feels that Tennyson is highly competent to express himself aptly whatever intention it is in his poetry and prose. It is probably because Tennyson is a master technician in poetry: his poetic language and its skills are rich and varied. He has absorbed all poetic skills, use of words, rhymes, rhythms, as in Maud and In Memoriam. Tennyson’s poetic excellence has already proved in Poems by Two Brothers co-authored with his brother, Frederick. In his criticism on Tennyson, Eliot often makes use of “great,” “wondrous,” or “master,” which he rarely uses when he studies other poets. Besides, it is rather interesting that Tennyson and Eliot are rather well compared: both use dramatic monologues while they withhold expression of personal feelings or emotion. As a poet and critic, Eliot is characterized by objective correlative, impersonality, unified sensibility, which almost parallel Tennyson’s. As a later poet, Eliot must have learned from Tennyson, a great technician of the last century.

Literature cannot be discussed in a social and cultural vacuum, because it is a culture-bound political construct. This paper investigates the Iimits of the modernist canon, focusing on the relationship between T. S. Eliot and women. Previous formalistic readings of Eliot is이ated the critics and readers from social and biographical concerns, which made it impossible to evaluate him in a balanced viewpoint. In recent decades, as Gibert indicates, "the criteria used to evaluate writers and to understand literary history have shifted from an emphasis on formal elements to an emphasis on ethical and moral ones. The poetics of Eliot, who is considered one of the most influential leading modernists, is closely related to his politics implied in his poetics.’'(191). Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar, in their essay entitled "Tradition and Female Talent" in No Man ’'s Land, attacks the mas띠Iinity of the modernists, especially Eliot, identifying modernism as masculinism. This paper reviews the re-evaluation of Eliot and of Iiterary modernism by such feminist critics. There can be found some problems and limits in the process of the formation of the modernist canon, which is delicately related with masculinism as indicated by Gilbert and Gubar. However, their presumption that modernism is a product of sexual battle also reveals its Iimits, because it is developed by the use of extreme binary logic. Consequently, this paper, trying to pin down the position of Eliot in the modernist canon, aims to extend the horizon of the understanding of Eliot and modernism as well, by indicating the problems and Iimits in the formation of the modernist canon and also those of the feminist criticism. Its clue lies in Eliot’s essay "Tradition and the lndividual Talent." ’Tradition’ by which Eliot means involves in it the possibility of the revision and innovation as well as the reservation. It is because "The existing monuments form an ideal order among themselves, which is modified by the introduction of the new (the really new) work of art among them." as Eliot emphasized in his essay. When the dynamism implied in the concept of "tradition" is properly understood, the new (the really new) work of art by women writers will be included in tradition, and the feminist criticism will be properly evaluated beyond its misunderstandings and distortions revealed in the blind attack on modemist writers and the modemist canon as well.