Wolsong Unit 1, a domestic heavy water reactor nuclear power plant, was permanently shut down in December 2019. Accordingly, Wolsong Unit 1 plans to prepare a Final Decommissioning Plan (FDP), submit it to the government by 2024, receive approval for decommissioning, and begin full-scale decommissioning. One of the important tasks in the decommissioning of Wolsong Unit 1 is to determine the decommissioning strategy. It is necessary to decide on a decommissioning strategy considering various factors and variables, secure the technical background, and justify it. The selection of a decommissioning strategy is best achieved through the use of formal decisionmaking assistance techniques, such as considerations related to influencing factors. It is very important to understand the basic decommissioning strategy alternatives and whether sufficient consideration has been given to situations where only a single unit is permanently shut down in a multi-unit site like Wolsong Unit 1, while the remaining units are in normal operation. As a process for selecting a decommissioning strategy, first, all considerations that could potentially affect decommissioning presented in the KINS Decommissioning Safety Review Guidelines were synthesized, influencing factors to be used in the decision-making process were determined, and the concept was defined. In order to select the most appropriate decommissioning strategy by considering various evaluation attributes of possible decommissioning alternatives (immediate dismantling and delayed dismantling), the Wolsong Unit 1 decommissioning strategy was evaluated by reflecting the AHP decision-making technique.

기후변화에 따른 도시하천의 건천화 현상은 앞으로 더욱더 심각해질 것으로 예상되고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 건천화의 적응전략으로서 하수처리수 재이용을 선정하였고 어느 지영기 우선적으로 선정되어야 하는가를 결정할 수 있는 방법을 제시하였다. 평가기준은 수문학적인 요소뿐만 아니라 인문·사회적인 요소도 포함하였다. 평가치와 가중치의 불확실성을 고려하기 위해 퍼지 이론을 사용하여서 기후변화로 인해 변화된 평가치와 평가기준에 대한 가중치의 불확실성을 완화하고자 하였다. Fuzzy TOPSIS 방법을 이용하여 각 대안을 평가하였다. 또한 로버스트한 의사결정을 위해서 통계적인 기법과 maximin, maximax, Hurwicz, equal likelihood criterion 방법을 사용하였다. 그 결과 Fuzzy TOPSIS를 통한 대안의 순위 선정과 로버스트 의사결정기법을 통해 불확실성과 순위의 애매모호함을 완화시켰다. 본 연구에서 제시한 방법은 하수처리수 재이용의 위치선정 뿐만 아니라 다양한 기후변화 시나리오를 고려한 수자원 사업의 우선순위를 결정하는데 사용될 수 있다.

도로교량의 경우 급속한 도시화로 인해 증가한 교통량을 처리하기 위해 교량확폭과 신설교량의 추가 건설 등의 방법이 사용되고 있다. 하지만 현재 국내에서는 확폭 또는 신설 교량의 추가건설의 타당성을 판단하기 위한 합리적인 절차나 기준이 마련되어 있지 않다. 또한 교량 확폭 공사 시에는 일반적인 교량신설 공사에 비해 불확실성을 내포한 사건들이 추가적으로 존재한다. 이에 본 논문에서는 의사결정수 방법을 이용해 교량확장에 따라 발생 가능한 사건의 기대 위험비용을 체계적으로 고려할 수 있는 개선된 형태의 생애주기비용 분석 모델을 제안하였다.

For efficient development of rural facilities, choice of their optimum locations would be an important issue, however, existing research works concentrated much more an allocation policy of urban industrial complex and public facilities than rural ones. In this study, because agricultural-cum-industrial complex has been the most widely developed representative one of rural facilities, it was selected as a case study facility. As a pre-study to system development, existing governmental location-decision system was checked and interviewing survey carried out to find out on-spot problems. And, being based on literature review and survey analysis results, 4-step optimum locational decision model was developed , formulation of locational goal system, ranking tabulation on components, determination of significance values of components, calculation of component scores. Finally, through the case study works on 3 sites, system applicability was checked, Considering together the simplicity problem of existing guidelines and the interviewing survey results favoring the diversified viewpoints, it would be necessary to develop multifaceted support system for locational decision making. 3-tier classification steps from the higher, middle to lower one were used and their underpinning viewpoints were sorted as on regional development, entrepreneurship, spatial rationality, from which a tentative locational goal system was formulated. Through the expert group checking, final locational goal system was determined having 3 of the higher classification items, 7 of the middle ones, 23 of the lower ogles. For ranking tabulation, 3 types of ranking criteria were arranged which were based on statistical analysis using mean and standard deviation(Type I ), its existence or not 1 good or not(Type E ), and the others(Type E ). From the significance evaluation results, regional development and entrepreneurship aspects were valued much higher than spatial rationality aspect. And, in the middle step, items as spread effects of regional economy, accessibility and social potentialities were highly valued while infrastructural development level and natural condition being low. The application results of the system to 3 case study total. However, the detailed ones differed among study the influencing effects on regional economy, and contrast greater the infrastructural development level. Conclusively, final evaluation values well represented the characteristics of each area. If this system be complemented and applied comprehensively by the successive studies, it would be developed to a general model of locational decision supporting system for rural facilities.