This paper proposes a software development evaluation index for the productivity related to Spring 2.5 and EJB 3.0 with same lightweight container architecture. Spring is a known successful open source standard model for lightweight container architecture. EJB in an enterprise environment as a standard framework is most commonly used in production. However, there is no comparison research about the performance of Spring 2.5 and EJB 3.0 with same identical platform. Quantitative analysis is supported as a part of LoC(Line of Code) analysis. There is a limit to develop the updated software with no the specific evaluating index for the productivity of the software. In this study, the development platform environment based on the same database schema system Spring 2.5 and EJB 3.0 is in the design and implementation. In addition, comparison and standardization of software development productivity assessment is to provide guidance.

  This paper proposes an object-oriented software development guidance and an evaluation index for the productivity related to EJB(Enterprise JavaBeans). EJB is a known successful standard model for LSDO(Large Size Distributed Object). However, there is n

In this paper, we propose an approach object oriented software development guidance and evaluation index for the productivity related to EJB(Enterprise JavaBeans) with J2EE development platform. In the digital convergence life, EJB become known success standard model of size distributed object. However, the EJB specification of 2.0 and 3.0 is lack of software development productivity comparison research in an identical platform until now. In addition, quantitative analysis support and try a part of LOC(Line of Code) analysis. Therefore, it limited a new attempt of software development productivity evaluation. Our approach is objective validity of the new EJB Specification after presenting of analysis of quantitative evaluation index in the same platform related with EJB 2.0 and 3.0. Base on the result, it suggests objective software development productivity research guidance.