It is time for German language teachers in Korea to strive for qualitative development. One of the tasks to achieve this is to develop German grammar books that explain the German language system in a way that suits Korean students. We should develop books on language learning, including German grammar, in accordance with the standard of the Gemeinsamer Europäischer Referenzrahmen. We should adjust the selection and order of the parts of grammar depending on the level of difficulty, frequency and the importance of communication. There should be beginner, intermediate and advanced levels in German grammar. In this paper, I have made suggestions for the beginner level. The task in the future is to implement and systemize these suggestions all the way down to the details of each part of speech. It is not overstatement to say that the strength of Korean students is their understanding of grammar. Instead of considering this strength as weakness, we should find a way to use it effectively in order to facilitate more qualitative German education.

In Germany, there is a lack of tests such as TOEFL and TOEIC. Many think that the individuality of students is ignored in such standardized tests. Multiple choice tests are criticized in Germany for the same reason. And Germans also think the evaluation form based on behaviorism is overused. Each province in Germany has its own system to control the Abitur of Gymnasium which is necessaη to gain the admission to universities. Students take examinations in each subject for the Abitur in the final year of high schools. The examinations are composed of diverse forms including subjective questions and sometimes multiple choice questions which are used only if necessary. Zertifikat Deutsch was developed in the 1960s and Test DaF has been used since 2001. Tests must be based on the principles of objectivity, reliability, and validity. Evaluations should follow the goal and the curriculum of education. Subjective, objective, and semi-subjective questions should be mixed. Tests themselves should not be the object of teaching, but just tools to improve students' abilities. Tests should raise students' motivation, let them consider their own ability, and help them to choose their ways of leaming. This paper suggests further that evaluation forms of German education in Korea should be systematized. A German level test that examines grammar, vocabulary, and the four functions of language should be developed. It must be closely related to the goal, quality, and levels of German education both in high schools and universities. The level test would be possible through the cooperation of organizations, Education Ministry, public institutions such as German societies and Goethe Institut. Databases of grammar, vocabulary, and the four functions of language could be built for each level of the test. This database should be helpful in teaching German and editing German textbooks as well. The test could also be acknowledged as an official German proficiency test and used for the entrance to undergraduate, graduate schools, jobs etc. The quality of German education will be improved through this consolidation.