본 연구는 식물 형태 및 성장 지표를 기반으로 친황다오 해안지역의 10가지 향토식물의 내염성을 평가 하여 내염성 식물의 육종 및 정원 적용에 대한 참고 자료를 제공하기 위해 시도되었다. 10종의 토종식물 묘목을 0.0%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0% NaCl 용액으로 물 배양기에 스트레스를 가하여 식물의 높은 성장 스트레스 지수, 염해지수, 염해율, 생존율을 계산하여 내염성 평가를 진행하였다. 그 결과 염분 스 트레스는 친황다오 해안지역에서 10종의 토종 식물의 성장을 다양한 정도로 억제했으며, 염분 농도가 증가함에 따라 식물의 높은 성장 스트레스 지수, 염분 손상 지수 및 염분 손상 비율은 증가하는 경향을 보였고 생존율은 전반적으로 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 식물에 따라 염분 스트레스에 대한 반응 정도가 다르며, 클러스터 분석과 소속 함수 분석을 통해 친황다오 해안지역의 10가지 향토식물은 극내염성인 뜰보리수(Elaeagnus multiflora), 고내염성 족제비싸리(Amorpha fruticosa), 용버들(Salix matsudana), 광대 싸리(Flueggea suffruticosa), 중내염성 호비수리(Lespedeza davurica), 아까시나무(Robinia pseudoacacia) 그리고 민감식물인 장구밥나무(Grewia biloba var. parviflora), 모감주나무(Koelreuteria paniculata.), 좀목 형(Vitex negundo var. heterophylla) 그리고 싸리(Lespedeza bicolor) 등 4개 유형의 내염성 식물군으로 나눌 수 있다. 이중 종합평가는 1위를 차지한 뜰보리수는 염습지 등 해안지역의 조경재료로 매우 탁월한 것으 로 밝혀졌다.

본 연구는 중국 산둥성 쯔보시 인민공원과 치성호 공원 이용자 설문조사 결과를 바탕으로 식재경관 조성지표 간의 상관성 및 유형화 특성을 분석할 목적으로 시도되었다. 연구결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 대부분 식재경관 조성지표 간 상관성이 있었으며, 사계절 경관과 흥미로운 식재와의 상관성이 가장 높았고 식물의 안전성과 식물 공간구축의 상관성이 그 다음이었다. 요인분석 결과, 미적 요인, 재료적 요인, 이용적 요인, 관리적 요인으로 유형화되었으며, 식물 층위의 미·꽃모양의 다양성·꽃색의 다양성·친근한 식물·교목과 관목 비율·식물의 상징성이 미적 요인에서 뚜렷한 영향을 미쳤다. 재료적 요인은 식물의 공간구축과 사계절 경관, 이용적 요인은 나무의 그늘과 식물종다양성, 관리적 요인은 식물 보호 관리가 비교적 영향이 큰 것으로 나타났다.

Research activities and discussions on specialized areas reflecting the specificity of landscape construction are necessary. Therefore, this study was conducted with the purpose of presenting basic data for efficient field management by deriving items necessary for safety management in landscape construction fields through experts' opinions. A survey was conducted using Delphi analysis to derive "management items" and "safety management items according to landscape type" for landscape construction field safety for a total of 15 landscape construction specialists. The survey results showed that four top items were derived from the "management items" for the safety of landscape construction fields; they include: "safety and health management organization and education," "industrial safety and health management expenses," "payment of personal protection," and "establishment of safety measures." In addition, two to five items for each higher item appeared and resulted in a total of 13 lower items. Personnel, organization, budget, etc. for safety management are always required in the field, and the monitoring part of whether these elements are working was also taken up as a management item. In the "Management items according to each landscape construction" a total of eight landscape type were distinguished, they include: ‘Reinforced concrete work’, ‘Masonry work’, ‘Plaster's work’, ‘Waterproof work’, ‘Stone masonry work’, ‘Pavement work’, ‘Facilities work’, and ‘Planting work’. Furthermore, two to seven sub-items for each construction type were derived, and a total of 35 management items were presented.

This study has intended to elicit the definition of rural landscape, to classify rural landscape type, and to develop the evaluation indicators of rural landscape, meeting the definition through delphi expert survey method. The survey was performed five times for 80 days by 20 experts. The delphi expert survey asked experts as follows: 1) to fill out open-ended questions regarding the definition of rural landscape, and classification of rural landscape types, and evaluation indicators; 2) to provide their own feasibility evaluation regarding the results of the previous answer; and 3) to reevaluate the feasibility of the definition, types, and indicators. Based on the survey results, this study has found the appropriate definition of rural landscape like the comprehensive complex of physical (objective) and nonphysical (subjective) factors characterizing natural and/or artificial scenary of rural village itself Also, this study has developed the evaluation indicators of rural landscape in accordance with space types and landscape units classified. The developed indicators included areal ratio, the degree of green naturality, the building coverage ratio for physical landscape field, and skyline, landscape adjectives, color landscape, semantic scale.

In terms of the indicators by the type for the landscape plan per the district nit, geographic ecology indicators were the items such as water, water system, topography and climate, while biological ecology indicators were the items such as green zone size, green zone ratio, biotope size and distribution. The sensory and visual indicators were the items such as view point, view axis and skyline, and the accessibility indicator items for the green zone were applied as the socially used indicators. As for the application method according to each indicator, the water or water system was expressed and applied through the slopes and elevation topographic analysis drawings, the climate was expressed and applied through the main direction of the wind and the cold wind pass alley drawings. As for the green zone size and green zone ratio, the land use according to the status and housing area development was compared to present the measured figures. In case of the biotop size and the distribution item, the range was limited to the preparation of the biotope drawings for the focused preservation. As for the view point and view axis, the view point was selected according to the view point to prepare and apply the view analysis drawing in which the view area to be preserved is analyzed. As for the skyline, its landscape photo was composed with the housing area shape, and then skyline photography was applied as the plan in order to propose and consider the various shapes of the skyline. As for the accessibility to the peen zone, the network drawing was drawn to reflect the users' accessibility and continuity of the green zone formed and preserved according to the land use plan and then the drawing was prepared and proposed as the applicable plan.